[SemaCXX] Fix ICE for unexpanded parameter pack

Summary:
The documentation for RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseDecl states that the
Decl being traversed may be null. In fact, this is the case when a
CXXCatchStmt with no exception decl is traversed. Because the visitor
for diagnosing unexpanded parameter packs does not check for null, it
ends up crashing when it attempts to call the Decl::isParameterPack
method on a null Decl pointer.

Add a null check to prevent an ICE, and a test case that would crash
otherwise. Also, because the test requires C++ exceptions and C++14,
change the test parameters for the entire test file. (Alternatively, I
thought about adding a new test file, but went with this approach for my
own convenience.)

Co-authored-by: Andreas Molzer <andreas.molzer@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>

Reviewers: rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56271

llvm-svn: 350501
This commit is contained in:
Brian Gesiak 2019-01-07 03:25:59 +00:00
parent a3077e6fb6
commit 7dda73a223
2 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ namespace {
// A function parameter pack is a pack expansion, so cannot contain
// an unexpanded parameter pack. Likewise for a template parameter
// pack that contains any references to other packs.
if (D->isParameterPack())
if (D && D->isParameterPack())
return true;
return inherited::TraverseDecl(D);

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++11 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++14 -fcxx-exceptions %s
namespace RedeclAliasTypedef {
template<typename U> using T = int;
@ -189,3 +189,7 @@ int sfinae_me() { return 0; } // expected-note{{candidate template ignored: subs
int g = sfinae_me<int>(); // expected-error{{no matching function for call to 'sfinae_me'}}
}
namespace NullExceptionDecl {
template<int... I> auto get = []() { try { } catch(...) {}; return I; }; // expected-error{{initializer contains unexpanded parameter pack 'I'}}
}