From 7b5566c5f5d056712deafdf4c0ae90800101b049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:53:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Mark LWG issues #2083, 2099 and 2105 as complete. No
 functionality change.

llvm-svn: 189044
---
 libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html b/libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html
index 99c8035720e8..9b28ad365294 100644
--- a/libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html
+++ b/libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html
@@ -123,11 +123,11 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2071">2071</a></td><td>std::valarray move-assignment</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2074">2074</a></td><td>Off by one error in std::reverse_copy</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2081">2081</a></td><td>Allocator requirements should include CopyConstructible 2083 const-qualification on weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2083">2083</a></td><td>const-qualification on weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2083">2083</a></td><td>const-qualification on weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2086">2086</a></td><td>Overly generic type support for math functions</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2099">2099</a></td><td>Unnecessary constraints of va_start() usage</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2099">2099</a></td><td>Unnecessary constraints of va_start() usage</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2103">2103</a></td><td>std::allocator_traits&lt;std::allocator&lt;T&gt;&gt;::propagate_on_container_move_assignment</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2105">2105</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements on const_iterator's value_type</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2105">2105</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements on const_iterator's value_type</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2110">2110</a></td><td>remove can't swap but note says it might</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2123">2123</a></td><td>merge() allocator requirements for lists versus forward lists</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2005">2005</a></td><td>unordered_map::insert(T&&) protection should apply to map too</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>