<rdar://problem/11562050>

"thread continue" uses zero based thread indexes, not the thread index ID.

Also fixed "thread until" if it uses the -t option.

llvm-svn: 157724
This commit is contained in:
Greg Clayton 2012-05-31 00:29:20 +00:00
parent ee48633937
commit 76927ee56d
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ public:
result.AppendMessage ("Resuming thread ");
for (idx=0; idx<num_threads; ++idx)
{
Thread *thread = process->GetThreadList().GetThreadAtIndex(idx).get();
Thread *thread = process->GetThreadList().FindThreadByIndexID(idx).get();
if (find(resume_thread_indexes.begin(), resume_thread_indexes.end(), idx) != resume_thread_indexes.end())
{
result.AppendMessageWithFormat ("%u ", idx);
@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ public:
// Set the actions that the threads should each take when resuming
for (idx=0; idx<num_threads; ++idx)
{
Thread *thread = process->GetThreadList().GetThreadAtIndex(idx).get();
Thread *thread = process->GetThreadList().FindThreadByIndexID(idx).get();
if (thread == current_thread)
{
result.AppendMessageWithFormat ("Resuming thread 0x%4.4llx in process %llu\n", thread->GetID(), process->GetID());
@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ public:
}
else
{
thread = process->GetThreadList().GetThreadAtIndex(m_options.m_thread_idx).get();
thread = process->GetThreadList().FindThreadByIndexID(m_options.m_thread_idx).get();
}
if (thread == NULL)