[X86] Remove an unnecessary 'if' that prevented treating INT64_MAX and -INT64_MAX as power of 2 minus 1 in the multiply expansion code.

Not sure why they were being explicitly excluded, but I believe all the math inside the if works. I changed the absolute value to be uint64_t instead of int64_t so INT64_MIN+1 wouldn't be signed wrap.

llvm-svn: 338101
This commit is contained in:
Craig Topper 2018-07-27 05:56:27 +00:00
parent eae4742d81
commit 561e298e29
2 changed files with 63 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@ -33928,45 +33928,43 @@ static SDValue combineMul(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
"Both cases that could cause potential overflows should have "
"already been handled.");
int64_t SignMulAmt = C->getSExtValue();
if ((SignMulAmt != INT64_MIN) && (SignMulAmt != INT64_MAX) &&
(SignMulAmt != -INT64_MAX)) {
int64_t AbsMulAmt = SignMulAmt < 0 ? -SignMulAmt : SignMulAmt;
if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1)) {
// (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(
ISD::ADD, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1), DL,
MVT::i8)));
// To negate, subtract the number from zero
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT,
DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewMul);
} else if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1)) {
// (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1),
DL, MVT::i8));
// To negate, reverse the operands of the subtract.
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0), NewMul);
else
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2)) {
// (mul x, 2^N + 2) => (add (add (shl x, N), x), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2),
DL, MVT::i8));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2)) {
// (mul x, 2^N - 2) => (sub (sub (shl x, N), x), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2),
DL, MVT::i8));
assert(SignMulAmt != INT64_MIN && "Int min should have been handled!");
uint64_t AbsMulAmt = SignMulAmt < 0 ? -SignMulAmt : SignMulAmt;
if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1)) {
// (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(
ISD::ADD, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1), DL,
MVT::i8)));
// To negate, subtract the number from zero
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT,
DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewMul);
} else if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1)) {
// (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1),
DL, MVT::i8));
// To negate, reverse the operands of the subtract.
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0), NewMul);
else
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
}
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2)) {
// (mul x, 2^N + 2) => (add (add (shl x, N), x), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2),
DL, MVT::i8));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2)) {
// (mul x, 2^N - 2) => (sub (sub (shl x, N), x), x)
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2),
DL, MVT::i8));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
}
}

View File

@ -499,8 +499,9 @@ entry:
define i64 @testOverflow(i64 %a) {
; X64-LABEL: testOverflow:
; X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
; X64-NEXT: movabsq $9223372036854775807, %rax # imm = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
; X64-NEXT: imulq %rdi, %rax
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
; X64-NEXT: shlq $63, %rax
; X64-NEXT: subq %rdi, %rax
; X64-NEXT: retq
;
; X86-LABEL: testOverflow:
@ -524,3 +525,27 @@ entry:
%tmp3 = mul i64 %a, 9223372036854775807
ret i64 %tmp3
}
define i64 @testNegOverflow(i64 %a) {
; X64-LABEL: testNegOverflow:
; X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
; X64-NEXT: shlq $63, %rax
; X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rdi
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
; X64-NEXT: retq
;
; X86-LABEL: testNegOverflow:
; X86: # %bb.0: # %entry
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
; X86-NEXT: movl $1, %edx
; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
; X86-NEXT: mull %edx
; X86-NEXT: shll $31, %ecx
; X86-NEXT: addl %ecx, %edx
; X86-NEXT: addl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %edx
; X86-NEXT: retl
entry:
%tmp3 = mul i64 %a, -9223372036854775807
ret i64 %tmp3
}