Temporarily revert r62487. It's causing this error during a release bootstrap of

llvm-gcc. Most likely, it's miscompiling one of the "gen*" programs:

/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm-gcc.obj/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm-gcc.obj/./prev-gcc/ -B/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm-gcc.install/i386-apple-darwin9.6.0/bin/ -c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc -I../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/build -I../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../libdecnumber -I/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm.obj/include -I/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm.src/include -DENABLE_LLVM -I/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvm.obj/../llvm.src/include  -D_DEBUG  -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS   -o build/gencondmd.o build/gencondmd.c
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:926: error: expected '}' before ')' token
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:926: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:926: warning: (near initialization for 'insn_conditions[4]')
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:926: error: expected '}' before ')' token
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:926: error: expected ',' or ';' before ')' token
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md:927: error: expected identifier or '(' before ',' token
../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/i386/sse.md:3458: error: expected identifier or '(' before ',' token
...

llvm-svn: 62506
This commit is contained in:
Bill Wendling 2009-01-19 08:46:20 +00:00
parent 8f367e53c7
commit 534d2e0bae
2 changed files with 3 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
@ -173,74 +172,6 @@ static bool CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *Succ) {
return true;
}
/// BlockIsReachableFrom - Return true if there is a path from StartBB to
/// DestBB. We do this by recursively walking the CFG from DestBB up to StartBB
/// unwind we either reach StartBB or find an unreachable chunk of the CFG.
///
/// Each entry in VisitedBlocks is either 0 -> not visited, 1 -> known reachable
/// 2 -> known unreachable, 3 -> visitation in progress.
static bool BlockIsReachableFrom(BasicBlock *StartBB, BasicBlock *DestBB,
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, unsigned> &VisitedBlocks) {
if (StartBB == DestBB) return true;
unsigned &BlockEntry = VisitedBlocks[DestBB];
if (BlockEntry == 1) return true; // Known reachable!
if (BlockEntry == 2 || // Known unreachable.
BlockEntry == 3) // Found a loop.
return false;
// If BlockEntry is 0, this is the first time we've seen this block. Mark it
// as being visited and recurse up predecessors.
BlockEntry = 3;
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(DestBB), E = pred_end(DestBB); PI != E;
++PI) {
if (BlockIsReachableFrom(StartBB, *PI, VisitedBlocks)) {
VisitedBlocks[DestBB] = 1;
return true;
}
}
// If we scanned all of our predecessors and we couldn't find a path to
// StartBB, then this block must be unreachable for sure. Record this to
// prevent visitation of this block in the future.
VisitedBlocks[DestBB] = 2;
return false;
}
/// RemoveUnreachableUsersOf - For each user of Inst, scan up the CFG until we
/// find Inst. If Inst is found, then the user is live, otherwise it is dead.
/// Remove dead users. This is basically a poor-man's dominance query, and is
/// worst-case linear time in the number of blocks in the function.
static void RemoveUnreachableUsersOf(Instruction *Inst) {
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, unsigned> VisitedBlocks;
BasicBlock *InstBB = Inst->getParent();
for (Instruction::use_iterator UI = Inst->use_begin(), E = Inst->use_end();
UI != E;) {
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
Use &TheUse = UI.getUse();
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User)) {
unsigned UseOp = UI.getOperandNo();
++UI;
if (BlockIsReachableFrom(InstBB, PN->getIncomingBlock(UseOp/2),
VisitedBlocks))
continue;
} else {
++UI;
if (BlockIsReachableFrom(InstBB, User->getParent(),
VisitedBlocks))
continue;
}
// If there is no path from Inst to this User, then this user is in dead
// code. Just replace uses of Inst with undef.
TheUse = UndefValue::get(Inst->getType());
}
}
/// TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock - BB contains an unconditional
/// branch to Succ, and contains no instructions other than PHI nodes and the
/// branch. If possible, eliminate BB.
@ -285,18 +216,12 @@ static bool TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB,
}
if (isa<PHINode>(&BB->front())) {
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> OldSuccPreds(pred_begin(Succ),
pred_end(Succ));
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16>
OldSuccPreds(pred_begin(Succ), pred_end(Succ));
// Move all PHI nodes in BB to Succ if they are alive, otherwise
// delete them.
while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(&BB->front())) {
// The algorithm below will not work if there are users of PN that are in
// unreachable blocks. These users will not be properly dominated by the
// instruction, but the IR is valid because dead code does not need to
// obey dominance properties.
RemoveUnreachableUsersOf(PN);
if (PN->use_empty()) {
// Just remove the dead phi. This happens if Succ's PHIs were the only
// users of the PHI nodes.

View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -simplifycfg | llvm-dis
; XFAIL: *
; PR3016
; Dead use caused invariant violation.