From 51cebc98f3d8f6b7d9a9bb8ec419a3ba82aa9d4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bjorn Pettersson Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 06:59:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [LCSSA] Do not remove used PHI nodes in formLCSSAForInstructions Summary: In formLCSSAForInstructions we speculatively add new PHI nodes, that sometimes ends up without having any uses. It has been discovered that sometimes an added PHI node can appear as being unused in one iteration of the Worklist, although it can end up being used by a PHI node added in a later iteration. We now check, a second time, that the PHI node still is unused before we remove it. This avoids an assert about "Trying to remove a phi with uses." for the added test case. Reviewers: davide, mzolotukhin, mattd, dberlin Reviewed By: mzolotukhin, dberlin Subscribers: dberlin, mzolotukhin, davide, bjope, uabelho, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46422 llvm-svn: 331741 --- llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp | 15 ++++-- llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/remove-phis.ll | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/remove-phis.ll diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp index 7b0ec6652db7..22af1216a4f5 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp @@ -226,11 +226,16 @@ bool llvm::formLCSSAForInstructions(SmallVectorImpl &Worklist, insertDebugValuesForPHIs(InstBB, NeedDbgValues); Changed = true; } - // Remove PHI nodes that did not have any uses rewritten. - for (PHINode *PN : PHIsToRemove) { - assert (PN->use_empty() && "Trying to remove a phi with uses."); - PN->eraseFromParent(); - } + // Remove PHI nodes that did not have any uses rewritten. We need to redo the + // use_empty() check here, because even if the PHI node wasn't used when added + // to PHIsToRemove, later added PHI nodes can be using it. This cleanup is + // not guaranteed to handle trees/cycles of PHI nodes that only are used by + // each other. Such situations has only been noticed when the input IR + // contains unreachable code, and leaving some extra redundant PHI nodes in + // such situations is considered a minor problem. + for (PHINode *PN : PHIsToRemove) + if (PN->use_empty()) + PN->eraseFromParent(); return Changed; } diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/remove-phis.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/remove-phis.ll new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..587fe7af3b9d --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/remove-phis.ll @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -lcssa -verify -S -o /dev/null + +; This bugpoint reduced test case used to assert when removing unused PHI nodes. +; Just verify that we do not assert/crash. + +define void @test() { +entry: + br label %gazank + +gazank: + %value = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ undef, %gazonk ] + br i1 undef, label %gazink, label %qqq + +gazink: + br i1 undef, label %gazonk, label %infinite.loop.pred + +gazonk: + br i1 undef, label %exit1, label %gazank + +qqq: + br i1 undef, label %www, label %exit2 + +www: + br i1 undef, label %qqq, label %foo.pred + +foo.pred: + br label %foo + +foo: + br i1 undef, label %bar, label %exit1.pred + +bar: + br i1 undef, label %foo, label %exit2.pred + +unreachable1: + br i1 undef, label %foo, label %exit2.pred + +exit1.pred: + br label %exit1 + +exit1: + ret void + +exit2.pred: + br label %exit2 + +exit2: + ret void + +infinite.loop.pred: + br label %infinite.loop + +infinite.loop: + %dead = phi i16 [ %value, %infinite.loop.pred ], [ 0, %infinite.loop ] + br label %infinite.loop +}