C++ really shouldn't check these #defines, thanks to Howard

for pointing this out!

llvm-svn: 64037
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2009-02-07 22:21:31 +00:00
parent 008242f6ea
commit 4293c8935a
1 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -100,10 +100,11 @@ typedef __UINTMAX_TYPE__ uintmax_t;
* C99 7.18.2.2 Limits of minimum-width integer types.
* Since we map these directly onto fixed-sized types, these values the same.
* C99 7.18.2.3 Limits of fastest minimum-width integer types.
*
* Note that C++ should not check __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS here, contrary to the
* claims of the C standard (see C++ 18.3.1p2, [cstdint.syn]).
*/
#if !defined(__cplusplus) || defined(__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS)
#define INT8_MAX 127
#define INT8_MIN (-128)
#define UINT8_MAX 255
@ -202,12 +203,11 @@ typedef __UINTMAX_TYPE__ uintmax_t;
#define WCHAR_MIN (-__WCHAR_MAX__-1)
#endif
#endif /* C++ needs __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS. */
/* C99 7.18.4 Macros for minimum-width integer constants. */
/* C99 Footnote 220: C++ requires __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS. */
#if !defined(__cplusplus) || defined(__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
/* C99 7.18.4 Macros for minimum-width integer constants.
*
* Note that C++ should not check __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS here, contrary to the
* claims of the C standard (see C++ 18.3.1p2, [cstdint.syn]).
*/
#define INT8_C(v) (v)
#define UINT8_C(v) (v##U)
@ -226,6 +226,4 @@ typedef __UINTMAX_TYPE__ uintmax_t;
#define INTMAX_C(v) (v##LL)
#define UINTMAX_C(v) (v##ULL)
#endif /* C++ requires __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS */
#endif /* __STDINT_H */