diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 4748daae49cb..39537e358b9f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -18510,7 +18510,7 @@ static bool combineRedundantDWordShuffle(SDValue N, MutableArrayRef<int> Mask,
   SmallVector<int, 4> VMask = getPSHUFShuffleMask(V);
   for (int &M : Mask)
     M = VMask[M];
-  V = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::PSHUFD, DL, MVT::v4i32, V.getOperand(0),
+  V = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::PSHUFD, DL, V.getValueType(), V.getOperand(0),
                   getV4X86ShuffleImm8ForMask(Mask, DAG));
 
   // It is possible that one of the combinable shuffles was completely absorbed
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pshufd-combine-crash.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pshufd-combine-crash.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..84c69e32bcc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pshufd-combine-crash.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 -mcpu=corei7 -debug
+
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+
+; Test that the dag combiner doesn't assert if we try to replace a sequence of two
+; v4f32 X86ISD::PSHUFD nodes with a single PSHUFD.
+
+
+define <4 x float> @test(<4 x float> %V) {
+  %1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %V, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 0, i32 2, i32 1>
+  %2 = shufflevector <4 x float> %1, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 0, i32 2, i32 1>
+  ret <4 x float> %2
+}
+