Update to new EH scheme.

llvm-svn: 138933

llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2003-10-29-CallSiteResolve.ll

@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ invoke_cont:            ; preds = %0
         ret float* %tmp.11
 
 X:              ; preds = %0
+        %exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
+                 cleanup
         ret float* null
 }
 
+declare i32 @__gxx_personality_v0(...)

llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2004-01-13-InstCombineInvokePHI.ll

@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ cont:           ; preds = %call, %entry
         ret i32 %V
 
 N:              ; preds = %call
+        %exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
+                 cleanup
         ret i32 0
 }
 
+declare i32 @__gxx_personality_v0(...)

llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2008-05-09-SinkOfInvoke.ll

@@ -29,5 +29,9 @@ invcont37:		; preds = %invcont31
 	ret void
 
 lpad:		; preds = %invcont31, %invcont, %entry
+        %exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
+                 cleanup
 	unreachable
 }
+
+declare i32 @__gxx_personality_v0(...)

llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/call.ll

@@ -107,9 +107,13 @@ invoke.cont:                                      ; preds = %entry
   unreachable
 
 try.handler:                                      ; preds = %entry
+  %exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
+            cleanup
   ret i8* null
 }
 
+declare i32 @__gxx_personality_v0(...)
+
 ; Don't turn this into "unreachable": the callee and caller don't agree in
 ; calling conv, but the implementation of test8a may actually end up using the
 ; right calling conv.