Downgrade the Error on an 'inline' operator new or delete to an ExtWarn. Some

projects are relying on such (questionable) practices, so we should give them
a way to opt out of this diagnostic.

llvm-svn: 194905
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2013-11-16 00:47:38 +00:00
parent b83422612a
commit 13dfdc88a9
3 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -5961,8 +5961,9 @@ def err_operator_new_delete_declared_in_namespace : Error<
"%0 cannot be declared inside a namespace">;
def err_operator_new_delete_declared_static : Error<
"%0 cannot be declared static in global scope">;
def err_operator_new_delete_declared_inline : Error<
"replacement function %0 cannot be declared 'inline'">;
def ext_operator_new_delete_declared_inline : ExtWarn<
"replacement function %0 cannot be declared 'inline'">,
InGroup<DiagGroup<"inline-new-delete">>;
def err_operator_new_delete_invalid_result_type : Error<
"%0 must return type %1">;
def err_operator_new_delete_dependent_result_type : Error<

View File

@ -6879,7 +6879,7 @@ Sema::ActOnFunctionDeclarator(Scope *S, Declarator &D, DeclContext *DC,
// N.B. We diagnose declarations instead of definitions per LWG issue 2340.
if (isInline && NewFD->isReplaceableGlobalAllocationFunction())
Diag(D.getDeclSpec().getInlineSpecLoc(),
diag::err_operator_new_delete_declared_inline)
diag::ext_operator_new_delete_declared_inline)
<< NewFD->getDeclName();
}

View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ void* operator new(size_t, int*); // expected-note 3 {{candidate}}
void* operator new(size_t, float*); // expected-note 3 {{candidate}}
void* operator new(size_t, S); // expected-note 2 {{candidate}}
inline void operator delete(void *); // expected-error {{replacement function 'operator delete' cannot be declared 'inline'}}
inline void operator delete(void *); // expected-warning {{replacement function 'operator delete' cannot be declared 'inline'}}
struct foo { };