From 13c13d4da880de70e6c9ee84a149a2b8e8eaaa3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Weber <nicolasweber@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:12:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Remove one I just added, add a more focused test for why the
 current code is correct.

llvm-svn: 119969
---
 clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp    | 2 --
 clang/test/SemaCXX/sourceranges.cpp | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
index e027e28e9adf..1d09fe2a1afb 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
@@ -912,8 +912,6 @@ void Parser::ParseCXXSimpleTypeSpecifier(DeclSpec &DS) {
 
   // type-name
   case tok::annot_typename: {
-    // FIXME: This should probably pass getAnnotationEndLoc() instead of Loc,
-    // but that breaks test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp.
     DS.SetTypeSpecType(DeclSpec::TST_typename, Loc, PrevSpec, DiagID,
                        getTypeAnnotation(Tok));
     
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/sourceranges.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/sourceranges.cpp
index c3ce279904d5..602d76baa9db 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/sourceranges.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/sourceranges.cpp
@@ -20,3 +20,8 @@ int main() {
   // CHECK: CXXNewExpr {{0x[0-9a-fA-F]+}} <col:19, col:28> 'foo::C *'
   P<foo::C> pr4 = new foo::C;
 }
+
+foo::A getName() {
+  // CHECK: CXXConstructExpr {{0x[0-9a-fA-F]+}} <col:10, col:17> 'foo::class A'
+  return foo::A();
+}