Generate constructor for value-initialization cases, even if the

implementation technique doesn't call the constructor at that point.
DR302. Fixes pr5296.

llvm-svn: 85249
This commit is contained in:
Fariborz Jahanian 2009-10-27 16:51:19 +00:00
parent 50b41ed060
commit 115654873d
2 changed files with 52 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -288,7 +288,20 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXTypeConstructExpr(SourceRange TypeRange, TypeTy *TypeRep,
<< FullRange);
assert(NumExprs == 0 && "Expected 0 expressions");
if (const RecordType *Record = Ty->getAs<RecordType>()) {
if (!Record->getDecl()->isUnion()) {
// As clarified in C++ DR302, generate constructor for
// value-initialization cases, even if the implementation technique
// doesn't call the constructor at that point.
ASTOwningVector<&ActionBase::DeleteExpr> ConstructorArgs(*this);
(void)PerformInitializationByConstructor(Ty, MultiExprArg(*this, 0, 0),
TypeRange.getBegin(),
TypeRange, DeclarationName(),
IK_Default, ConstructorArgs);
}
}
// C++ [expr.type.conv]p2:
// The expression T(), where T is a simple-type-specifier for a non-array
// complete object type or the (possibly cv-qualified) void type, creates an
@ -489,7 +502,21 @@ Sema::BuildCXXNew(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
return ExprError(Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_new_uninitialized_const)
<< TypeRange);
} else if (NumConsArgs == 0) {
// Object is value-initialized. Do nothing.
// Object is value-initialized.
if (const RecordType *Record = AllocType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
if (!Record->getDecl()->isUnion()) {
// As clarified in C++ DR302, generate constructor for
// value-initialization cases, even if the implementation technique
// doesn't call the constructor at that point.
ASTOwningVector<&ActionBase::DeleteExpr> ConstructorArgs(*this);
(void)PerformInitializationByConstructor(AllocType,
MultiExprArg(*this, 0, 0),
TypeRange.getBegin(),
TypeRange, DeclarationName(),
IK_Default,
ConstructorArgs);
}
}
} else if (NumConsArgs == 1) {
// Object is direct-initialized.
// FIXME: What DeclarationName do we pass in here?

View File

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++0x
struct A {
~A();
const int i; // expected-note {{declared at}}
};
struct B {
// B is a non-POD with no user-written constructor.
// It has a nontrivial generated constructor.
const int i[12]; // expected-note {{declared at}}
A a;
};
int main () {
// Value-initializing a "B" doesn't call the default constructor for
// "B"; it value-initializes the members of B. Therefore it shouldn't
// cause an error on generation of the default constructor for the
// following:
new B(); // expected-error {{cannot define the implicit default constructor for 'struct B', because const member 'i'}}
(void)B();
(void)A(); // expected-error {{cannot define the implicit default constructor for 'struct A', because const member 'i'}}
}