replica
/
hanchenye-llvm-project
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Some of the build bots are unhappy about the overload of the global operator new() because it was accidentally marked noexcept instead of noexcept(false). This should correct those bots. 

llvm-svn: 248797
This commit is contained in:
Aaron Ballman 2015-09-29 14:26:00 +00:00
parent 897048bee3
commit 0f28d62a12
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp
View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ struct S {
}; };
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:7: warning: declaration of 'operator new' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:7: warning: declaration of 'operator new' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope
void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept; void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept(false);
struct T { struct T {
// Sized deallocations are not enabled by default, and so this new/delete pair // Sized deallocations are not enabled by default, and so this new/delete pair