replica
/
hanchenye-llvm-project
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Patch for 2466 is ready 

llvm-svn: 249352
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Clow 2015-10-05 21:08:49 +00:00
parent 91cbed84d9
commit 0dbf123f7b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
libcxx/www/kona.html
View File

@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2435">2435</a></td><td><tt>reference_wrapper::operator()</tt>'s Remark should be deleted</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2447">2447</a></td><td>Allocators and <tt>volatile</tt>-qualified value types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2462">2462</a></td><td><tt>std::ios_base::failure</tt> is overspecified</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2466">2466</a></td><td><tt>allocator_traits::max_size()</tt> default behavior is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2466">2466</a></td><td><tt>allocator_traits::max_size()</tt> default behavior is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2469">2469</a></td><td>Wrong specification of Requires clause of <tt>operator[]</tt> for <tt>map</tt> and <tt>unordered_map</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2473">2473</a></td><td><tt>basic_filebuf</tt>'s relation to C <tt>FILE</tt> semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2476">2476</a></td><td><tt>scoped_allocator_adaptor</tt> is not assignable</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
<li><i>2435 - Wording cleanup; no code change required</i></li>
<li>2447 - I don't know if there's any work here.</li>
<li>2462 - No code change necessary. Are there tests here? Should there be?</li>
<li>2466 - Simple change; need a test.</li>
<li><i>2466 - Simple change; need a test.</i></li>
<li>2469 - I suspect this is just wording cleanup, but it needs a closer look.</li>
<li>2473 - I suspect this is just wording cleanup, but it needs a closer look.</li>
<li>2476 - Simple change; need tests.</li>