Don't emit -Wnon-virtual-dtor on final classes, since it's not a problem there.

The base class is the culprit/risk here - a sealed/final derived class
with virtual functions and a non-virtual dtor can't accidentally be
polymorphically destroyed (if the base class's dtor is protected - which
also suppresses this warning).

llvm-svn: 208449
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2014-05-09 22:02:28 +00:00
parent d0eda92845
commit 04e2e665cb
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -4413,7 +4413,8 @@ void Sema::CheckCompletedCXXClass(CXXRecordDecl *Record) {
// Warn if the class has virtual methods but non-virtual public destructor.
if (Record->isPolymorphic() && !Record->isDependentType()) {
CXXDestructorDecl *dtor = Record->getDestructor();
if (!dtor || (!dtor->isVirtual() && dtor->getAccess() == AS_public))
if ((!dtor || (!dtor->isVirtual() && dtor->getAccess() == AS_public)) &&
!Record->hasAttr<FinalAttr>())
Diag(dtor ? dtor->getLocation() : Record->getLocation(),
diag::warn_non_virtual_dtor) << Context.getRecordType(Record);
}

View File

@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct B { // expected-warning {{has virtual functions but non-virtual destructo
struct D: B {}; // expected-warning {{has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor}}
struct F final: B {}; // expected-warning {{has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor}}
struct F final : B {};
struct VB {
virtual void foo();