clang-format: Improve line wrapping behavior in call sequences.

r256750 has been leading to an undesired behavior:

  aaaaaaaaaa
      .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);

This change increases penalty for wrapping before member accesses that aren't
calls. Thus, this is again formatted as (as it has been before r256750):

  aaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(
      aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);

llvm-svn: 256830

clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp

@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ void ContinuationIndenter::addTokenOnCurrentLine(LineState &State, bool DryRun,
                                TT_CtorInitializerColon)) &&
              ((Previous.getPrecedence() != prec::Assignment &&
                (Previous.isNot(tok::lessless) || Previous.OperatorIndex != 0 ||
-                !Previous.LastOperator)) ||
+                Previous.NextOperator)) ||
               Current.StartsBinaryExpression)) {
     // Always indent relative to the RHS of the expression unless this is a
     // simple assignment without binary expression on the RHS. Also indent
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ unsigned ContinuationIndenter::moveStateToNextToken(LineState &State,
         std::min(State.LowestLevelOnLine, Current.NestingLevel);
   if (Current.isMemberAccess())
     State.Stack.back().StartOfFunctionCall =
-        Current.LastOperator ? 0 : State.Column;
+        !Current.NextOperator ? 0 : State.Column;
   if (Current.is(TT_SelectorName)) {
     State.Stack.back().ObjCSelectorNameFound = true;
     if (Style.IndentWrappedFunctionNames) {

clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h

@@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ struct FormatToken {
   /// with the same precedence, contains the 0-based operator index.
   unsigned OperatorIndex = 0;
 
-  /// \brief Is this the last operator (or "."/"->") in a sequence of operators
-  /// with the same precedence?
-  bool LastOperator = false;
+  /// \brief If this is an operator (or "."/"->") in a sequence of operators
+  /// with the same precedence, points to the next operator.
+  FormatToken *NextOperator = nullptr;
 
   /// \brief Is this token part of a \c DeclStmt defining multiple variables?
   ///

clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp

@@ -1330,6 +1330,8 @@ public:
       } else {
         // Operator found.
         if (CurrentPrecedence == Precedence) {
+          if (LatestOperator)
+            LatestOperator->NextOperator = Current;
           LatestOperator = Current;
           Current->OperatorIndex = OperatorIndex;
           ++OperatorIndex;
@@ -1339,7 +1341,7 @@ public:
     }
 
     if (LatestOperator && (Current || Precedence > 0)) {
-      LatestOperator->LastOperator = true;
+      // LatestOperator->LastOperator = true;
       if (Precedence == PrecedenceArrowAndPeriod) {
         // Call expressions don't have a binary operator precedence.
         addFakeParenthesis(Start, prec::Unknown);
@@ -1771,7 +1773,15 @@ unsigned TokenAnnotator::splitPenalty(const AnnotatedLine &Line,
     // which might otherwise be blown up onto many lines. Here, clang-format
     // won't produce "hanging" indents anyway as there is no other trailing
     // call.
-    return Right.LastOperator ? 150 : 35;
+    //
+    // Also apply higher penalty is not a call as that might lead to a wrapping
+    // like:
+    //
+    //   aaaaaaa
+    //       .aaaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb(cccccccc);
+    return !Right.NextOperator || !Right.NextOperator->Previous->closesScope()
+               ? 150
+               : 35;
   }
 
   if (Right.is(TT_TrailingAnnotation) &&
@@ -1823,7 +1833,7 @@ unsigned TokenAnnotator::splitPenalty(const AnnotatedLine &Line,
 
   if (Right.is(tok::lessless)) {
     if (Left.is(tok::string_literal) &&
-        (!Right.LastOperator || Right.OperatorIndex != 1)) {
+        (Right.NextOperator || Right.OperatorIndex != 1)) {
       StringRef Content = Left.TokenText;
       if (Content.startswith("\""))
         Content = Content.drop_front(1);

clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp

@@ -4164,10 +4164,6 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsBuilderPattern) {
       "aaaaaaa->aaaaaaa\n"
       "    ->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)\n"
       "    ->aaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
-  verifyFormat(
-      "return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\n"
-      "    .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)\n"
-      "    .aaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
   verifyFormat(
       "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()->aaaaaa(bbbbb)->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa( // break\n"
       "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
@@ -4238,6 +4234,15 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsBuilderPattern) {
       "return !soooooooooooooome_map\n"
       "            .insert(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)\n"
       "            .second;");
+  verifyFormat(
+      "return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\n"
+      "    .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)\n"
+      "    .aaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
+  // No hanging indent here.
+  verifyFormat("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(\n"
+               "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
+  verifyFormat("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(\n"
+               "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);");
 }
 
 TEST_F(FormatTest, BreaksAccordingToOperatorPrecedence) {
@@ -7487,8 +7492,8 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatObjCMethodExpr) {
                "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];");
   verifyFormat("[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa]\n"
                "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];");
-  verifyFormat("[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa\n"
-               "        .aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa];", // FIXME: Indentation seems off.
+  verifyFormat("[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa\n"
+               "        .aaaaaaaa];", // FIXME: Indentation seems off.
                getLLVMStyleWithColumns(60));
 
   verifyFormat(