hanchenye-llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/ASTResultSynthesizer.cpp

436 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
//===-- ASTResultSynthesizer.cpp --------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclGroup.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclObjC.h"
#include "clang/AST/Expr.h"
#include "clang/AST/Stmt.h"
#include "clang/Parse/Parser.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "lldb/Core/Log.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/ASTResultSynthesizer.h"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace lldb_private;
ASTResultSynthesizer::ASTResultSynthesizer(ASTConsumer *passthrough,
TypeFromUser desired_type) :
m_ast_context (NULL),
m_passthrough (passthrough),
m_passthrough_sema (NULL),
m_sema (NULL),
m_desired_type (desired_type)
{
if (!m_passthrough)
return;
m_passthrough_sema = dyn_cast<SemaConsumer>(passthrough);
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::~ASTResultSynthesizer()
{
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::Initialize(ASTContext &Context)
{
m_ast_context = &Context;
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->Initialize(Context);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::TransformTopLevelDecl(Decl* D)
{
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
if (NamedDecl *named_decl = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(D))
{
if (log)
{
if (named_decl->getIdentifier())
log->Printf("TransformTopLevelDecl(%s)", named_decl->getIdentifier()->getNameStart());
else if (ObjCMethodDecl *method_decl = dyn_cast<ObjCMethodDecl>(D))
log->Printf("TransformTopLevelDecl(%s)", method_decl->getSelector().getAsString().c_str());
else
log->Printf("TransformTopLevelDecl(<complex>)");
}
}
if (LinkageSpecDecl *linkage_spec_decl = dyn_cast<LinkageSpecDecl>(D))
{
RecordDecl::decl_iterator decl_iterator;
for (decl_iterator = linkage_spec_decl->decls_begin();
decl_iterator != linkage_spec_decl->decls_end();
++decl_iterator)
{
TransformTopLevelDecl(*decl_iterator);
}
}
else if (ObjCMethodDecl *method_decl = dyn_cast<ObjCMethodDecl>(D))
{
if (m_ast_context &&
!method_decl->getSelector().getAsString().compare("$__lldb_expr:"))
{
SynthesizeObjCMethodResult(method_decl);
}
}
else if (FunctionDecl *function_decl = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D))
{
if (m_ast_context &&
!function_decl->getNameInfo().getAsString().compare("$__lldb_expr"))
{
SynthesizeFunctionResult(function_decl);
}
}
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::HandleTopLevelDecl(DeclGroupRef D)
{
DeclGroupRef::iterator decl_iterator;
for (decl_iterator = D.begin();
decl_iterator != D.end();
++decl_iterator)
{
Decl *decl = *decl_iterator;
TransformTopLevelDecl(decl);
}
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->HandleTopLevelDecl(D);
}
bool
ASTResultSynthesizer::SynthesizeFunctionResult (FunctionDecl *FunDecl)
{
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
ASTContext &Ctx(*m_ast_context);
if (!m_sema)
return false;
FunctionDecl *function_decl = FunDecl;
if (!function_decl)
return false;
if (log && log->GetVerbose())
{
std::string s;
raw_string_ostream os(s);
Ctx.getTranslationUnitDecl()->print(os);
os.flush();
log->Printf("AST context before transforming:\n%s", s.c_str());
}
Stmt *function_body = function_decl->getBody();
CompoundStmt *compound_stmt = dyn_cast<CompoundStmt>(function_body);
bool ret = SynthesizeBodyResult (compound_stmt,
function_decl);
if (log && log->GetVerbose())
{
std::string s;
raw_string_ostream os(s);
function_decl->print(os);
os.flush();
log->Printf ("Transformed function AST:\n%s", s.c_str());
}
return ret;
}
bool
ASTResultSynthesizer::SynthesizeObjCMethodResult (ObjCMethodDecl *MethodDecl)
{
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
ASTContext &Ctx(*m_ast_context);
if (!m_sema)
return false;
if (!MethodDecl)
return false;
if (log && log->GetVerbose())
{
std::string s;
raw_string_ostream os(s);
Ctx.getTranslationUnitDecl()->print(os);
os.flush();
log->Printf("AST context before transforming:\n%s", s.c_str());
}
Stmt *method_body = MethodDecl->getBody();
CompoundStmt *compound_stmt = dyn_cast<CompoundStmt>(method_body);
bool ret = SynthesizeBodyResult (compound_stmt,
MethodDecl);
if (log)
{
std::string s;
raw_string_ostream os(s);
MethodDecl->print(os);
os.flush();
log->Printf("Transformed function AST:\n%s", s.c_str());
}
return ret;
}
bool
ASTResultSynthesizer::SynthesizeBodyResult (CompoundStmt *Body,
DeclContext *DC)
{
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
ASTContext &Ctx(*m_ast_context);
CompoundStmt *compound_stmt = dyn_cast<CompoundStmt>(Body);
if (!compound_stmt)
return false;
if (compound_stmt->body_empty())
return false;
Stmt **last_stmt_ptr = compound_stmt->body_end() - 1;
Stmt *last_stmt = *last_stmt_ptr;
while (dyn_cast<NullStmt>(last_stmt))
{
if (last_stmt_ptr != compound_stmt->body_begin())
{
last_stmt_ptr--;
last_stmt = *last_stmt_ptr;
}
}
Expr *last_expr = dyn_cast<Expr>(last_stmt);
if (!last_expr)
// No auxiliary variable necessary; expression returns void
return true;
// is_lvalue is used to record whether the expression returns an assignable Lvalue or an
// Rvalue. This is relevant because they are handled differently.
//
// For Lvalues
//
// - In AST result synthesis (here!) the expression E is transformed into an initialization
// T *$__lldb_expr_result_ptr = &E.
//
// - In structure allocation, a pointer-sized slot is allocated in the struct that is to be
// passed into the expression.
//
// - In IR transformations, reads and writes to $__lldb_expr_result_ptr are redirected at
// an entry in the struct ($__lldb_arg) passed into the expression. (Other persistent
// variables are treated similarly, having been materialized as references, but in those
// cases the value of the reference itself is never modified.)
//
// - During materialization, $0 (the result persistent variable) is ignored.
//
// - During dematerialization, $0 is marked up as a load address with value equal to the
// contents of the structure entry.
//
// For Rvalues
//
// - In AST result synthesis the expression E is transformed into an initialization
// static T $__lldb_expr_result = E.
//
// - In structure allocation, a pointer-sized slot is allocated in the struct that is to be
// passed into the expression.
//
// - In IR transformations, an instruction is inserted at the beginning of the function to
// dereference the pointer resident in the slot. Reads and writes to $__lldb_expr_result
// are redirected at that dereferenced version. Guard variables for the static variable
// are excised.
//
// - During materialization, $0 (the result persistent variable) is populated with the location
// of a newly-allocated area of memory.
//
// - During dematerialization, $0 is ignored.
bool is_lvalue =
(last_expr->getValueKind() == VK_LValue || last_expr->getValueKind() == VK_XValue) &&
(last_expr->getObjectKind() == OK_Ordinary);
QualType expr_qual_type = last_expr->getType();
clang::Type *expr_type = expr_qual_type.getTypePtr();
if (!expr_type)
return false;
if (expr_type->isVoidType())
return true;
if (log)
{
std::string s = expr_qual_type.getAsString();
log->Printf("Last statement is an %s with type: %s", (is_lvalue ? "lvalue" : "rvalue"), s.c_str());
}
clang::VarDecl *result_decl;
if (is_lvalue)
{
IdentifierInfo &result_ptr_id = Ctx.Idents.get("$__lldb_expr_result_ptr");
QualType ptr_qual_type = Ctx.getPointerType(expr_qual_type);
result_decl = VarDecl::Create(Ctx,
DC,
SourceLocation(),
&result_ptr_id,
ptr_qual_type,
NULL,
SC_Static,
SC_Static);
if (!result_decl)
return false;
ExprResult address_of_expr = m_sema->CreateBuiltinUnaryOp(SourceLocation(), UO_AddrOf, last_expr);
m_sema->AddInitializerToDecl(result_decl, address_of_expr.take());
}
else
{
IdentifierInfo &result_id = Ctx.Idents.get("$__lldb_expr_result");
result_decl = VarDecl::Create(Ctx,
DC,
SourceLocation(),
&result_id,
expr_qual_type,
NULL,
SC_Static,
SC_Static);
if (!result_decl)
return false;
m_sema->AddInitializerToDecl(result_decl, last_expr);
}
DC->addDecl(result_decl);
///////////////////////////////
// call AddInitializerToDecl
//
//m_sema->AddInitializerToDecl(result_decl, last_expr);
/////////////////////////////////
// call ConvertDeclToDeclGroup
//
Sema::DeclGroupPtrTy result_decl_group_ptr;
result_decl_group_ptr = m_sema->ConvertDeclToDeclGroup(result_decl);
////////////////////////
// call ActOnDeclStmt
//
StmtResult result_initialization_stmt_result(m_sema->ActOnDeclStmt(result_decl_group_ptr,
SourceLocation(),
SourceLocation()));
////////////////////////////////////////////////
// replace the old statement with the new one
//
*last_stmt_ptr = reinterpret_cast<Stmt*>(result_initialization_stmt_result.take());
return true;
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::HandleTranslationUnit(ASTContext &Ctx)
{
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->HandleTranslationUnit(Ctx);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::HandleTagDeclDefinition(TagDecl *D)
{
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->HandleTagDeclDefinition(D);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::CompleteTentativeDefinition(VarDecl *D)
{
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->CompleteTentativeDefinition(D);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::HandleVTable(CXXRecordDecl *RD, bool DefinitionRequired)
{
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->HandleVTable(RD, DefinitionRequired);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::PrintStats()
{
if (m_passthrough)
m_passthrough->PrintStats();
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::InitializeSema(Sema &S)
{
m_sema = &S;
if (m_passthrough_sema)
m_passthrough_sema->InitializeSema(S);
}
void
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTResultSynthesizer::ForgetSema()
{
m_sema = NULL;
if (m_passthrough_sema)
m_passthrough_sema->ForgetSema();
}