hanchenye-llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Quality.cpp

417 lines
14 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===--- Quality.cpp ---------------------------------------------*- C++-*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "Quality.h"
#include "FileDistance.h"
#include "URI.h"
#include "index/Index.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclVisitor.h"
#include "clang/Basic/CharInfo.h"
#include "clang/Basic/SourceManager.h"
#include "clang/Sema/CodeCompleteConsumer.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
#include "llvm/Support/FormatVariadic.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <cmath>
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm;
static bool isReserved(StringRef Name) {
// FIXME: Should we exclude _Bool and others recognized by the standard?
return Name.size() >= 2 && Name[0] == '_' &&
(isUppercase(Name[1]) || Name[1] == '_');
}
static bool hasDeclInMainFile(const Decl &D) {
auto &SourceMgr = D.getASTContext().getSourceManager();
for (auto *Redecl : D.redecls()) {
auto Loc = SourceMgr.getSpellingLoc(Redecl->getLocation());
if (SourceMgr.isWrittenInMainFile(Loc))
return true;
}
return false;
}
static bool hasUsingDeclInMainFile(const CodeCompletionResult &R) {
const auto &Context = R.Declaration->getASTContext();
const auto &SourceMgr = Context.getSourceManager();
if (R.ShadowDecl) {
const auto Loc = SourceMgr.getExpansionLoc(R.ShadowDecl->getLocation());
if (SourceMgr.isWrittenInMainFile(Loc))
return true;
}
return false;
}
static SymbolQualitySignals::SymbolCategory categorize(const NamedDecl &ND) {
class Switch
: public ConstDeclVisitor<Switch, SymbolQualitySignals::SymbolCategory> {
public:
#define MAP(DeclType, Category) \
SymbolQualitySignals::SymbolCategory Visit##DeclType(const DeclType *) { \
return SymbolQualitySignals::Category; \
}
MAP(NamespaceDecl, Namespace);
MAP(NamespaceAliasDecl, Namespace);
MAP(TypeDecl, Type);
MAP(TypeAliasTemplateDecl, Type);
MAP(ClassTemplateDecl, Type);
[clangd] Tune down quality score for class constructors so that it's ranked after class types. Summary: Currently, class constructors have the same score as the class types, and they are often ranked before class types. This is often not desireable and can be annoying when snippet is enabled and constructor signatures are added. Metrics: ``` ================================================================================================== OVERALL ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 111117 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 64.06 (+0.20) Top-5: 75.73% (+0.14%) Top-100: 93.71% (+0.01%) Full identifiers: MRR: 98.25 (+0.55) Top-5: 99.04% (+0.03%) Top-100: 99.16% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 15.23 (+0.02) 50.50 (-0.02) 65.04 (+0.11) 70.75 (+0.19) 74.37 (+0.25) 79.43 (+0.32) Top-5: 40.90% (+0.03%) 74.52% (+0.03%) 87.23% (+0.15%) 91.68% (+0.08%) 93.68% (+0.14%) 95.87% (+0.12%) Top-100: 68.21% (+0.02%) 96.28% (+0.07%) 98.43% (+0.00%) 98.72% (+0.00%) 98.74% (+0.01%) 98.81% (+0.00%) ================================================================================================== DEFAULT ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 57535 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 58.07 (+0.37) Top-5: 69.94% (+0.26%) Top-100: 90.14% (+0.03%) Full identifiers: MRR: 97.13 (+1.05) Top-5: 98.14% (+0.06%) Top-100: 98.34% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 13.91 (+0.00) 38.53 (+0.01) 55.58 (+0.21) 63.63 (+0.30) 69.23 (+0.47) 72.87 (+0.60) Top-5: 24.99% (+0.00%) 62.70% (+0.06%) 82.80% (+0.30%) 88.66% (+0.16%) 92.02% (+0.27%) 93.53% (+0.21%) Top-100: 51.56% (+0.05%) 93.19% (+0.13%) 97.30% (+0.00%) 97.81% (+0.00%) 97.85% (+0.01%) 97.79% (+0.00%) ``` Remark: - The full-id completions have +1.05 MRR improvement. - There is no noticeable impact on EXPLICIT_MEMBER_ACCESS and WANT_LOCAL. Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49667 llvm-svn: 337816
2018-07-24 16:51:52 +08:00
MAP(CXXConstructorDecl, Constructor);
MAP(ValueDecl, Variable);
MAP(VarTemplateDecl, Variable);
MAP(FunctionDecl, Function);
MAP(FunctionTemplateDecl, Function);
MAP(Decl, Unknown);
#undef MAP
};
return Switch().Visit(&ND);
}
static SymbolQualitySignals::SymbolCategory
categorize(const CodeCompletionResult &R) {
if (R.Declaration)
return categorize(*R.Declaration);
if (R.Kind == CodeCompletionResult::RK_Macro)
return SymbolQualitySignals::Macro;
// Everything else is a keyword or a pattern. Patterns are mostly keywords
// too, except a few which we recognize by cursor kind.
switch (R.CursorKind) {
case CXCursor_CXXMethod:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Function;
case CXCursor_ModuleImportDecl:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Namespace;
case CXCursor_MacroDefinition:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Macro;
case CXCursor_TypeRef:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Type;
case CXCursor_MemberRef:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Variable;
[clangd] Tune down quality score for class constructors so that it's ranked after class types. Summary: Currently, class constructors have the same score as the class types, and they are often ranked before class types. This is often not desireable and can be annoying when snippet is enabled and constructor signatures are added. Metrics: ``` ================================================================================================== OVERALL ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 111117 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 64.06 (+0.20) Top-5: 75.73% (+0.14%) Top-100: 93.71% (+0.01%) Full identifiers: MRR: 98.25 (+0.55) Top-5: 99.04% (+0.03%) Top-100: 99.16% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 15.23 (+0.02) 50.50 (-0.02) 65.04 (+0.11) 70.75 (+0.19) 74.37 (+0.25) 79.43 (+0.32) Top-5: 40.90% (+0.03%) 74.52% (+0.03%) 87.23% (+0.15%) 91.68% (+0.08%) 93.68% (+0.14%) 95.87% (+0.12%) Top-100: 68.21% (+0.02%) 96.28% (+0.07%) 98.43% (+0.00%) 98.72% (+0.00%) 98.74% (+0.01%) 98.81% (+0.00%) ================================================================================================== DEFAULT ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 57535 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 58.07 (+0.37) Top-5: 69.94% (+0.26%) Top-100: 90.14% (+0.03%) Full identifiers: MRR: 97.13 (+1.05) Top-5: 98.14% (+0.06%) Top-100: 98.34% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 13.91 (+0.00) 38.53 (+0.01) 55.58 (+0.21) 63.63 (+0.30) 69.23 (+0.47) 72.87 (+0.60) Top-5: 24.99% (+0.00%) 62.70% (+0.06%) 82.80% (+0.30%) 88.66% (+0.16%) 92.02% (+0.27%) 93.53% (+0.21%) Top-100: 51.56% (+0.05%) 93.19% (+0.13%) 97.30% (+0.00%) 97.81% (+0.00%) 97.85% (+0.01%) 97.79% (+0.00%) ``` Remark: - The full-id completions have +1.05 MRR improvement. - There is no noticeable impact on EXPLICIT_MEMBER_ACCESS and WANT_LOCAL. Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49667 llvm-svn: 337816
2018-07-24 16:51:52 +08:00
case CXCursor_Constructor:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Constructor;
default:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Keyword;
}
}
static SymbolQualitySignals::SymbolCategory
categorize(const index::SymbolInfo &D) {
switch (D.Kind) {
case index::SymbolKind::Namespace:
case index::SymbolKind::NamespaceAlias:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Namespace;
case index::SymbolKind::Macro:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Macro;
case index::SymbolKind::Enum:
case index::SymbolKind::Struct:
case index::SymbolKind::Class:
case index::SymbolKind::Protocol:
case index::SymbolKind::Extension:
case index::SymbolKind::Union:
case index::SymbolKind::TypeAlias:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Type;
case index::SymbolKind::Function:
case index::SymbolKind::ClassMethod:
case index::SymbolKind::InstanceMethod:
case index::SymbolKind::StaticMethod:
case index::SymbolKind::InstanceProperty:
case index::SymbolKind::ClassProperty:
case index::SymbolKind::StaticProperty:
case index::SymbolKind::Destructor:
case index::SymbolKind::ConversionFunction:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Function;
[clangd] Tune down quality score for class constructors so that it's ranked after class types. Summary: Currently, class constructors have the same score as the class types, and they are often ranked before class types. This is often not desireable and can be annoying when snippet is enabled and constructor signatures are added. Metrics: ``` ================================================================================================== OVERALL ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 111117 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 64.06 (+0.20) Top-5: 75.73% (+0.14%) Top-100: 93.71% (+0.01%) Full identifiers: MRR: 98.25 (+0.55) Top-5: 99.04% (+0.03%) Top-100: 99.16% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 15.23 (+0.02) 50.50 (-0.02) 65.04 (+0.11) 70.75 (+0.19) 74.37 (+0.25) 79.43 (+0.32) Top-5: 40.90% (+0.03%) 74.52% (+0.03%) 87.23% (+0.15%) 91.68% (+0.08%) 93.68% (+0.14%) 95.87% (+0.12%) Top-100: 68.21% (+0.02%) 96.28% (+0.07%) 98.43% (+0.00%) 98.72% (+0.00%) 98.74% (+0.01%) 98.81% (+0.00%) ================================================================================================== DEFAULT ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 57535 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 58.07 (+0.37) Top-5: 69.94% (+0.26%) Top-100: 90.14% (+0.03%) Full identifiers: MRR: 97.13 (+1.05) Top-5: 98.14% (+0.06%) Top-100: 98.34% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 13.91 (+0.00) 38.53 (+0.01) 55.58 (+0.21) 63.63 (+0.30) 69.23 (+0.47) 72.87 (+0.60) Top-5: 24.99% (+0.00%) 62.70% (+0.06%) 82.80% (+0.30%) 88.66% (+0.16%) 92.02% (+0.27%) 93.53% (+0.21%) Top-100: 51.56% (+0.05%) 93.19% (+0.13%) 97.30% (+0.00%) 97.81% (+0.00%) 97.85% (+0.01%) 97.79% (+0.00%) ``` Remark: - The full-id completions have +1.05 MRR improvement. - There is no noticeable impact on EXPLICIT_MEMBER_ACCESS and WANT_LOCAL. Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49667 llvm-svn: 337816
2018-07-24 16:51:52 +08:00
case index::SymbolKind::Constructor:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Constructor;
case index::SymbolKind::Variable:
case index::SymbolKind::Field:
case index::SymbolKind::EnumConstant:
case index::SymbolKind::Parameter:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Variable;
case index::SymbolKind::Using:
case index::SymbolKind::Module:
case index::SymbolKind::Unknown:
return SymbolQualitySignals::Unknown;
}
llvm_unreachable("Unknown index::SymbolKind");
}
static bool isInstanceMember(const NamedDecl *ND) {
if (!ND)
return false;
if (const auto *TP = dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(ND))
ND = TP->TemplateDecl::getTemplatedDecl();
if (const auto *CM = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(ND))
return !CM->isStatic();
return isa<FieldDecl>(ND); // Note that static fields are VarDecl.
}
static bool isInstanceMember(const index::SymbolInfo &D) {
switch (D.Kind) {
case index::SymbolKind::InstanceMethod:
case index::SymbolKind::InstanceProperty:
case index::SymbolKind::Field:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
void SymbolQualitySignals::merge(const CodeCompletionResult &SemaCCResult) {
Deprecated |= (SemaCCResult.Availability == CXAvailability_Deprecated);
Category = categorize(SemaCCResult);
if (SemaCCResult.Declaration) {
if (auto *ID = SemaCCResult.Declaration->getIdentifier())
ReservedName = ReservedName || isReserved(ID->getName());
} else if (SemaCCResult.Kind == CodeCompletionResult::RK_Macro)
ReservedName = ReservedName || isReserved(SemaCCResult.Macro->getName());
}
void SymbolQualitySignals::merge(const Symbol &IndexResult) {
Deprecated |= (IndexResult.Flags & Symbol::Deprecated);
References = std::max(IndexResult.References, References);
Category = categorize(IndexResult.SymInfo);
ReservedName = ReservedName || isReserved(IndexResult.Name);
}
float SymbolQualitySignals::evaluate() const {
float Score = 1;
// This avoids a sharp gradient for tail symbols, and also neatly avoids the
// question of whether 0 references means a bad symbol or missing data.
if (References >= 10) {
// Use a sigmoid style boosting function, which flats out nicely for large
// numbers (e.g. 2.58 for 1M refererences).
// The following boosting function is equivalent to:
// m = 0.06
// f = 12.0
// boost = f * sigmoid(m * std::log(References)) - 0.5 * f + 0.59
// Sample data points: (10, 1.00), (100, 1.41), (1000, 1.82),
// (10K, 2.21), (100K, 2.58), (1M, 2.94)
float S = std::pow(References, -0.06);
Score *= 6.0 * (1 - S) / (1 + S) + 0.59;
}
if (Deprecated)
Score *= 0.1f;
if (ReservedName)
Score *= 0.1f;
switch (Category) {
case Keyword: // Often relevant, but misses most signals.
Score *= 4; // FIXME: important keywords should have specific boosts.
break;
case Type:
case Function:
case Variable:
Score *= 1.1f;
break;
case Namespace:
Score *= 0.8f;
break;
case Macro:
Score *= 0.5f;
break;
case Unknown:
[clangd] Tune down quality score for class constructors so that it's ranked after class types. Summary: Currently, class constructors have the same score as the class types, and they are often ranked before class types. This is often not desireable and can be annoying when snippet is enabled and constructor signatures are added. Metrics: ``` ================================================================================================== OVERALL ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 111117 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 64.06 (+0.20) Top-5: 75.73% (+0.14%) Top-100: 93.71% (+0.01%) Full identifiers: MRR: 98.25 (+0.55) Top-5: 99.04% (+0.03%) Top-100: 99.16% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 15.23 (+0.02) 50.50 (-0.02) 65.04 (+0.11) 70.75 (+0.19) 74.37 (+0.25) 79.43 (+0.32) Top-5: 40.90% (+0.03%) 74.52% (+0.03%) 87.23% (+0.15%) 91.68% (+0.08%) 93.68% (+0.14%) 95.87% (+0.12%) Top-100: 68.21% (+0.02%) 96.28% (+0.07%) 98.43% (+0.00%) 98.72% (+0.00%) 98.74% (+0.01%) 98.81% (+0.00%) ================================================================================================== DEFAULT ================================================================================================== Total measurements: 57535 (+0) All measurements: MRR: 58.07 (+0.37) Top-5: 69.94% (+0.26%) Top-100: 90.14% (+0.03%) Full identifiers: MRR: 97.13 (+1.05) Top-5: 98.14% (+0.06%) Top-100: 98.34% (+0.00%) Filter length 0-5: MRR: 13.91 (+0.00) 38.53 (+0.01) 55.58 (+0.21) 63.63 (+0.30) 69.23 (+0.47) 72.87 (+0.60) Top-5: 24.99% (+0.00%) 62.70% (+0.06%) 82.80% (+0.30%) 88.66% (+0.16%) 92.02% (+0.27%) 93.53% (+0.21%) Top-100: 51.56% (+0.05%) 93.19% (+0.13%) 97.30% (+0.00%) 97.81% (+0.00%) 97.85% (+0.01%) 97.79% (+0.00%) ``` Remark: - The full-id completions have +1.05 MRR improvement. - There is no noticeable impact on EXPLICIT_MEMBER_ACCESS and WANT_LOCAL. Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49667 llvm-svn: 337816
2018-07-24 16:51:52 +08:00
case Constructor: // No boost constructors so they are after class types.
break;
}
return Score;
}
raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const SymbolQualitySignals &S) {
OS << formatv("=== Symbol quality: {0}\n", S.evaluate());
OS << formatv("\tReferences: {0}\n", S.References);
OS << formatv("\tDeprecated: {0}\n", S.Deprecated);
OS << formatv("\tReserved name: {0}\n", S.ReservedName);
OS << formatv("\tCategory: {0}\n", static_cast<int>(S.Category));
return OS;
}
static SymbolRelevanceSignals::AccessibleScope
computeScope(const NamedDecl *D) {
// Injected "Foo" within the class "Foo" has file scope, not class scope.
const DeclContext *DC = D->getDeclContext();
if (auto *R = dyn_cast_or_null<RecordDecl>(D))
if (R->isInjectedClassName())
DC = DC->getParent();
// Class constructor should have the same scope as the class.
if (isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(D))
DC = DC->getParent();
bool InClass = false;
for (; !DC->isFileContext(); DC = DC->getParent()) {
if (DC->isFunctionOrMethod())
return SymbolRelevanceSignals::FunctionScope;
InClass = InClass || DC->isRecord();
}
if (InClass)
return SymbolRelevanceSignals::ClassScope;
// This threshold could be tweaked, e.g. to treat module-visible as global.
if (D->getLinkageInternal() < ExternalLinkage)
return SymbolRelevanceSignals::FileScope;
return SymbolRelevanceSignals::GlobalScope;
}
void SymbolRelevanceSignals::merge(const Symbol &IndexResult) {
// FIXME: Index results always assumed to be at global scope. If Scope becomes
// relevant to non-completion requests, we should recognize class members etc.
SymbolURI = IndexResult.CanonicalDeclaration.FileURI;
IsInstanceMember |= isInstanceMember(IndexResult.SymInfo);
}
void SymbolRelevanceSignals::merge(const CodeCompletionResult &SemaCCResult) {
if (SemaCCResult.Availability == CXAvailability_NotAvailable ||
SemaCCResult.Availability == CXAvailability_NotAccessible)
Forbidden = true;
if (SemaCCResult.Declaration) {
// We boost things that have decls in the main file. We give a fixed score
// for all other declarations in sema as they are already included in the
// translation unit.
float DeclProximity = (hasDeclInMainFile(*SemaCCResult.Declaration) ||
hasUsingDeclInMainFile(SemaCCResult))
? 1.0
: 0.6;
SemaProximityScore = std::max(DeclProximity, SemaProximityScore);
IsInstanceMember |= isInstanceMember(SemaCCResult.Declaration);
}
// Declarations are scoped, others (like macros) are assumed global.
if (SemaCCResult.Declaration)
Scope = std::min(Scope, computeScope(SemaCCResult.Declaration));
NeedsFixIts = !SemaCCResult.FixIts.empty();
}
static std::pair<float, unsigned> proximityScore(llvm::StringRef SymbolURI,
URIDistance *D) {
if (!D || SymbolURI.empty())
return {0.f, 0u};
unsigned Distance = D->distance(SymbolURI);
// Assume approximately default options are used for sensible scoring.
return {std::exp(Distance * -0.4f / FileDistanceOptions().UpCost), Distance};
}
float SymbolRelevanceSignals::evaluate() const {
float Score = 1;
if (Forbidden)
return 0;
Score *= NameMatch;
// Proximity scores are [0,1] and we translate them into a multiplier in the
// range from 1 to 3.
Score *= 1 + 2 * std::max(proximityScore(SymbolURI, FileProximityMatch).first,
SemaProximityScore);
// Symbols like local variables may only be referenced within their scope.
// Conversely if we're in that scope, it's likely we'll reference them.
if (Query == CodeComplete) {
// The narrower the scope where a symbol is visible, the more likely it is
// to be relevant when it is available.
switch (Scope) {
case GlobalScope:
break;
case FileScope:
Score *= 1.5;
break;
case ClassScope:
Score *= 2;
break;
case FunctionScope:
Score *= 4;
break;
}
}
// Penalize non-instance members when they are accessed via a class instance.
if (!IsInstanceMember &&
(Context == CodeCompletionContext::CCC_DotMemberAccess ||
Context == CodeCompletionContext::CCC_ArrowMemberAccess)) {
Score *= 0.5;
}
// Penalize for FixIts.
if (NeedsFixIts)
Score *= 0.5;
return Score;
}
raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const SymbolRelevanceSignals &S) {
OS << formatv("=== Symbol relevance: {0}\n", S.evaluate());
OS << formatv("\tName match: {0}\n", S.NameMatch);
OS << formatv("\tForbidden: {0}\n", S.Forbidden);
OS << formatv("\tNeedsFixIts: {0}\n", S.NeedsFixIts);
OS << formatv("\tIsInstanceMember: {0}\n", S.IsInstanceMember);
OS << formatv("\tContext: {0}\n", getCompletionKindString(S.Context));
OS << formatv("\tSymbol URI: {0}\n", S.SymbolURI);
if (S.FileProximityMatch) {
auto Score = proximityScore(S.SymbolURI, S.FileProximityMatch);
OS << formatv("\tIndex proximity: {0} (distance={1})\n", Score.first,
Score.second);
}
OS << formatv("\tSema proximity: {0}\n", S.SemaProximityScore);
OS << formatv("\tQuery type: {0}\n", static_cast<int>(S.Query));
OS << formatv("\tScope: {0}\n", static_cast<int>(S.Scope));
return OS;
}
float evaluateSymbolAndRelevance(float SymbolQuality, float SymbolRelevance) {
return SymbolQuality * SymbolRelevance;
}
// Produces an integer that sorts in the same order as F.
// That is: a < b <==> encodeFloat(a) < encodeFloat(b).
static uint32_t encodeFloat(float F) {
static_assert(std::numeric_limits<float>::is_iec559, "");
constexpr uint32_t TopBit = ~(~uint32_t{0} >> 1);
// Get the bits of the float. Endianness is the same as for integers.
uint32_t U = FloatToBits(F);
// IEEE 754 floats compare like sign-magnitude integers.
if (U & TopBit) // Negative float.
return 0 - U; // Map onto the low half of integers, order reversed.
return U + TopBit; // Positive floats map onto the high half of integers.
}
std::string sortText(float Score, llvm::StringRef Name) {
// We convert -Score to an integer, and hex-encode for readability.
// Example: [0.5, "foo"] -> "41000000foo"
std::string S;
llvm::raw_string_ostream OS(S);
write_hex(OS, encodeFloat(-Score), llvm::HexPrintStyle::Lower,
/*Width=*/2 * sizeof(Score));
OS << Name;
OS.flush();
return S;
}
llvm::raw_ostream &operator<<(llvm::raw_ostream &OS,
const SignatureQualitySignals &S) {
OS << formatv("=== Signature Quality:\n");
OS << formatv("\tNumber of parameters: {0}\n", S.NumberOfParameters);
OS << formatv("\tNumber of optional parameters: {0}\n",
S.NumberOfOptionalParameters);
OS << formatv("\tContains active parameter: {0}\n",
S.ContainsActiveParameter);
OS << formatv("\tKind: {0}\n", S.Kind);
return OS;
}
} // namespace clangd
} // namespace clang