hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/cxx-ambig-decl-expr.cpp

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s

struct X {
  template<typename T, typename U>
  static void f(int, int);
};

void f() {
  void (*ptr)(int, int) = &X::f<int, int>;
}
When we're performing tentative parsing to determine whether the parser is looking at a declaration or an expression, use a '=' to conclude that we are parsing a declaration. This is wrong. However, our previous approach of finding a comma after the '=' is also wrong, because the ',' could be part of a template-argument-list. So, for now we're going to use the same wrong heuristic as GCC and Visual C++, because less real-world code is likely to be broken this way. I've opened PR7655 to keep track of our wrongness; note also the XFAIL'd test. Fixes <rdar://problem/8193163>. llvm-svn: 108459 2010-07-16 05:05:01 +08:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s`

			`struct X {`
			`template<typename T, typename U>`
			`static void f(int, int);`
			`};`

			`void f() {`
			`void (*ptr)(int, int) = &X::f<int, int>;`
			`}`