hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/ms-fuzzy-asm.c

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify -fms-extensions

#define M __asm int 0x2c
#define M2 int

void t1(void) { M }
void t2(void) { __asm int 0x2c }
void t3(void) { __asm M2 0x2c } 
void* t4(void) { __asm mov eax, fs:[0x10] }
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-16 04:14:24 +08:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify -fms-extensions`
Support fuzzy parsing MS line-oriented __asm's that originate from a macro (a case where we can't obtain source line info). As the test case indicates, we don't currently support line-oriented asm statements that mix file/macro body tokens. llvm-svn: 46878 2008-02-08 11:36:19 +08:00
			`#define M __asm int 0x2c`
			`#define M2 int`

			`void t1(void) { M }`
			`void t2(void) { __asm int 0x2c }`
Use getLogicalLineNumber() in FuzzyParseMicrosoftAsmStatement(), it's more general and simplifies the code. llvm-svn: 46885 2008-02-09 02:01:27 +08:00			`void t3(void) { __asm M2 0x2c }`
Testcase for recent checkin. llvm-svn: 91080 2009-12-11 08:10:15 +08:00			`void* t4(void) { __asm mov eax, fs:[0x10] }`