hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/vectorcall.c

78 lines
4.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=i386-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
void __vectorcall v1(int a, int b) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v1@@8"(i32 inreg %a, i32 inreg %b)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v1@@16"(i32 %a, i32 %b)
void __vectorcall v2(char a, char b) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v2@@8"(i8 inreg signext %a, i8 inreg signext %b)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v2@@16"(i8 %a, i8 %b)
struct Small { int a; };
void __vectorcall v3(int a, struct Small b, int c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v3@@12"(i32 inreg %a, %struct.Small* byval align 4 %b, i32 inreg %c)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v3@@24"(i32 %a, i32 %b.coerce, i32 %c)
struct Large { int a[5]; };
void __vectorcall v4(int a, struct Large b, int c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v4@@28"(i32 inreg %a, %struct.Large* byval align 4 %b, i32 inreg %c)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01v4@@40"(i32 %a, %struct.Large* %b, i32 %c)
struct HFA2 { double x, y; };
struct HFA4 { double w, x, y, z; };
struct HFA5 { double v, w, x, y, z; };
void __vectorcall hfa1(int a, struct HFA4 b, int c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa1@@40"(i32 inreg %a, double %b.0, double %b.1, double %b.2, double %b.3, i32 inreg %c)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa1@@48"(i32 %a, double %b.0, double %b.1, double %b.2, double %b.3, i32 %c)
// HFAs that would require more than six total SSE registers are passed
// indirectly. Additional vector arguments can consume the rest of the SSE
// registers.
void __vectorcall hfa2(struct HFA4 a, struct HFA4 b, double c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa2@@72"(double %a.0, double %a.1, double %a.2, double %a.3, %struct.HFA4* inreg %b, double %c)
Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation. Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton of code to compute and propagate alignment information. As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in the expression emitter. The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct when performing operations on objects that are locally known to be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with member alignment. Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset. We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular, field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min. Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics, but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I apologize. ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is, we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals). This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later patch. I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store} APIs; they will be going away eventually. llvm-svn: 246985
2015-09-08 16:05:57 +08:00
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa2@@72"(double %a.0, double %a.1, double %a.2, double %a.3, %struct.HFA4* %b, double %c)
// Ensure that we pass builtin types directly while counting them against the
// SSE register usage.
void __vectorcall hfa3(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, struct HFA2 f) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa3@@56"(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, %struct.HFA2* inreg %f)
Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation. Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton of code to compute and propagate alignment information. As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in the expression emitter. The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct when performing operations on objects that are locally known to be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with member alignment. Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset. We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular, field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min. Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics, but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I apologize. ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is, we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals). This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later patch. I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store} APIs; they will be going away eventually. llvm-svn: 246985
2015-09-08 16:05:57 +08:00
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa3@@56"(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, %struct.HFA2* %f)
// Aggregates with more than four elements are not HFAs and are passed byval.
// Because they are not classified as homogeneous, they don't get special
// handling to ensure alignment.
void __vectorcall hfa4(struct HFA5 a) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa4@@40"(%struct.HFA5* byval align 4)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hfa4@@40"(%struct.HFA5* %a)
// Return HFAs of 4 or fewer elements in registers.
static struct HFA2 g_hfa2;
struct HFA2 __vectorcall hfa5(void) { return g_hfa2; }
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc %struct.HFA2 @"\01hfa5@@0"()
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc %struct.HFA2 @"\01hfa5@@0"()
typedef float __attribute__((vector_size(16))) v4f32;
struct HVA2 { v4f32 x, y; };
struct HVA4 { v4f32 w, x, y, z; };
void __vectorcall hva1(int a, struct HVA4 b, int c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva1@@72"(i32 inreg %a, <4 x float> %b.0, <4 x float> %b.1, <4 x float> %b.2, <4 x float> %b.3, i32 inreg %c)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva1@@80"(i32 %a, <4 x float> %b.0, <4 x float> %b.1, <4 x float> %b.2, <4 x float> %b.3, i32 %c)
void __vectorcall hva2(struct HVA4 a, struct HVA4 b, v4f32 c) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva2@@144"(<4 x float> %a.0, <4 x float> %a.1, <4 x float> %a.2, <4 x float> %a.3, %struct.HVA4* inreg %b, <4 x float> %c)
Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation. Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton of code to compute and propagate alignment information. As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in the expression emitter. The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct when performing operations on objects that are locally known to be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with member alignment. Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset. We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular, field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min. Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics, but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I apologize. ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is, we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals). This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later patch. I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store} APIs; they will be going away eventually. llvm-svn: 246985
2015-09-08 16:05:57 +08:00
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva2@@144"(<4 x float> %a.0, <4 x float> %a.1, <4 x float> %a.2, <4 x float> %a.3, %struct.HVA4* %b, <4 x float> %c)
void __vectorcall hva3(v4f32 a, v4f32 b, v4f32 c, v4f32 d, v4f32 e, struct HVA2 f) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva3@@112"(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b, <4 x float> %c, <4 x float> %d, <4 x float> %e, %struct.HVA2* inreg %f)
Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation. Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton of code to compute and propagate alignment information. As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in the expression emitter. The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct when performing operations on objects that are locally known to be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with member alignment. Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset. We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular, field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min. Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics, but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I apologize. ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is, we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals). This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later patch. I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store} APIs; they will be going away eventually. llvm-svn: 246985
2015-09-08 16:05:57 +08:00
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01hva3@@112"(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b, <4 x float> %c, <4 x float> %d, <4 x float> %e, %struct.HVA2* %f)
typedef float __attribute__((ext_vector_type(3))) v3f32;
struct OddSizeHVA { v3f32 x, y; };
void __vectorcall odd_size_hva(struct OddSizeHVA a) {}
// CHECK: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01odd_size_hva@@32"(<3 x float> %a.0, <3 x float> %a.1)
// X64: define x86_vectorcallcc void @"\01odd_size_hva@@32"(<3 x float> %a.0, <3 x float> %a.1)