hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/check-increment.c

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics

int printf(const char *, ...);
typedef int *pint;
int main() {
   int a[5] = {0};
   pint p = a;
   p++;
   printf("%d\n", *p);
}
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-16 04:14:24 +08:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s`
Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive. llvm-svn: 166280 2012-10-19 20:44:48 +08:00			`// expected-no-diagnostics`
Make sure Sema::CheckIncrementDecrementOperand() removes typedefs when doing it's analysis. Thanks to Seo Sanghyeon for his excellent (first) bug fix! llvm-svn: 43994 2007-11-11 22:15:57 +08:00
Don't #include <stdio.h> when tests don't need it, or use clang instead of clang-cc when they do. llvm-svn: 89070 2009-11-17 16:57:36 +08:00			`int printf(const char *, ...);`
Make sure Sema::CheckIncrementDecrementOperand() removes typedefs when doing it's analysis. Thanks to Seo Sanghyeon for his excellent (first) bug fix! llvm-svn: 43994 2007-11-11 22:15:57 +08:00			`typedef int *pint;`
			`int main() {`
			`int a[5] = {0};`
			`pint p = a;`
			`p++;`
			`printf("%d\n", *p);`
			`}`