hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/rtti-options.cpp

49 lines
3.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Check that we emit warnings/errors for different combinations of
// exceptions, rtti, and vptr sanitizer flags for generic (unknown) x86 linux,
// and for PS4 when its behaviour differs from the generic x86-linux.
// No warnings/errors should be emitted for unknown, except if combining
// the vptr sanitizer with -fno-rtti
// Special cases: -fcxx-exceptions in C code should warn about unused arguments
// We should also not have any rtti-related arguments
// RUN: %clang -x c -### -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -c -fcxx-exceptions %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-UNUSED -check-prefix=CHECK-RTTI %s
// Make sure we keep the last -frtti/-fno-rtti argument
Improve our handling of rtti/sanitize=vptr/sanitize=undefined This patch removes the huge blob of code that is dealing with rtti/exceptions/sanitizers and replaces it with: A ToolChain function which, for a given set of Args, figures out if rtti should be: - enabled - disabled implicitly - disabled explicitly A change in the way SanitizerArgs figures out what sanitizers to enable (or if it should error out, or warn); And a check for exceptions/rtti interaction inside addExceptionArgs. The RTTIMode algorithm is: - If -mkernel, -fapple-kext, or -fno-rtti are passed, rtti was disabled explicitly; - If -frtti was passed or we're not targetting the PS4, rtti is enabled; - If -fexceptions or -fcxx-exceptions was passed and we're targetting the PS4, rtti was enabled implicitly; - If we're targetting the PS4, rtti is disabled implicitly; - Otherwise, rtti is enabled; Since the only flag needed to pass to -cc1 is -fno-rtti if we want to disable it, there's no problem in saying rtti is enabled if we're compiling C code, so we don't look at the input file type. addExceptionArgs now looks at the RTTIMode and warns that rtti is being enabled implicitly if targetting the PS4 and exceptions are on. It also errors out if, targetting the PS4, -fno-rtti was passed, and exceptions were turned on. SanitizerArgs now errors out if rtti was disabled explicitly and the vptr sanitizer was enabled implicitly, but just turns off vptr if rtti is disabled but -fsanitize=undefined was passed. Also fixed tests, removed duplicate name from addExceptionArgs comment, and added one or two surrounding lines when running clang-format. This changes test/Driver/fsanitize.c to make it not expect a warning when passed -fsanitize=undefined -fno-rtti, but expect vptr to not be on. Removed all users and definition of SanitizerArgs::sanitizesVptr(). Reviewers: samsonov Subscribers: llvm-commits, samsonov, rsmith Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7525 llvm-svn: 229801
2015-02-19 09:04:49 +08:00
// RUN: %clang -### -c -fno-rtti -frtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-RTTI %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -frtti -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-RTTI %s
// -fsanitize=vptr
Improve our handling of rtti/sanitize=vptr/sanitize=undefined This patch removes the huge blob of code that is dealing with rtti/exceptions/sanitizers and replaces it with: A ToolChain function which, for a given set of Args, figures out if rtti should be: - enabled - disabled implicitly - disabled explicitly A change in the way SanitizerArgs figures out what sanitizers to enable (or if it should error out, or warn); And a check for exceptions/rtti interaction inside addExceptionArgs. The RTTIMode algorithm is: - If -mkernel, -fapple-kext, or -fno-rtti are passed, rtti was disabled explicitly; - If -frtti was passed or we're not targetting the PS4, rtti is enabled; - If -fexceptions or -fcxx-exceptions was passed and we're targetting the PS4, rtti was enabled implicitly; - If we're targetting the PS4, rtti is disabled implicitly; - Otherwise, rtti is enabled; Since the only flag needed to pass to -cc1 is -fno-rtti if we want to disable it, there's no problem in saying rtti is enabled if we're compiling C code, so we don't look at the input file type. addExceptionArgs now looks at the RTTIMode and warns that rtti is being enabled implicitly if targetting the PS4 and exceptions are on. It also errors out if, targetting the PS4, -fno-rtti was passed, and exceptions were turned on. SanitizerArgs now errors out if rtti was disabled explicitly and the vptr sanitizer was enabled implicitly, but just turns off vptr if rtti is disabled but -fsanitize=undefined was passed. Also fixed tests, removed duplicate name from addExceptionArgs comment, and added one or two surrounding lines when running clang-format. This changes test/Driver/fsanitize.c to make it not expect a warning when passed -fsanitize=undefined -fno-rtti, but expect vptr to not be on. Removed all users and definition of SanitizerArgs::sanitizesVptr(). Reviewers: samsonov Subscribers: llvm-commits, samsonov, rsmith Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7525 llvm-svn: 229801
2015-02-19 09:04:49 +08:00
// Make sure we only error/warn once, when trying to enable vptr and
// undefined and have -fno-rtti
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=vptr -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-SAN-ERROR -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=vptr %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=vptr -frtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=vptr -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-SAN-ERROR %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=undefined %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fsanitize=undefined -frtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-scei-ps4 -fsanitize=vptr %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-SAN-WARN %s
// Exceptions + no/default rtti
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fcxx-exceptions -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fcxx-exceptions %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// In C++, -fexceptions implies -fcxx-exceptions
// RUN: %clang -x c++ -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fexceptions -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// RUN: %clang -x c++ -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fexceptions %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// -frtti + exceptions
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fcxx-exceptions -frtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OK %s
// -f{no-,}rtti/default
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-scei-ps4 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-RTTI %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -frtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-RTTI %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -fno-rtti %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-RTTI %s
// RUN: %clang -### -c -target x86_64-unknown-unknown %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-RTTI %s
// CHECK-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fcxx-exceptions'
// CHECK-SAN-WARN: implicitly disabling vptr sanitizer because rtti wasn't enabled
// CHECK-SAN-ERROR: invalid argument '-fsanitize=vptr' not allowed with '-fno-rtti'
// CHECK-RTTI-NOT: "-fno-rtti"
// CHECK-NO-RTTI: "-fno-rtti"
// CHECK-OK-NOT: {{warning:|error:}}