* Revert "Revert "[Scheduler] Profiling features (#16145)" (#16392)"
This reverts commit 4ba1412305.
* Fix copy paste mistake
* Remove init path dependency on ArrayBuffer
* Add a regression test for cancelling multiple tasks
* Prevent deopt from adding isQueued later
* Remove pop() calls that were added for profiling
* Verify that Suspend/Unsuspend events match up in tests
This currently breaks tests.
* Treat Suspend and Resume as exiting and entering work loop
Their definitions used to be more fuzzy. For example, Suspend didn't always fire on exit, and sometimes fired when we did _not_ exit (such as at task enqueue).
I chatted to Boone, and he's saying treating Suspend and Resume as strictly exiting and entering the loop is fine for their use case.
* Revert "Prevent deopt from adding isQueued later"
This reverts commit 9c30b0b695.
Unnecessary because GCC
* Start counter with 1
* Group exports into unstable_Profiling namespace
* No catch in PROD codepath
* No label TODO
* No null checks
* Refactor a bit to use less property access
* Add test for invoking an event before mount
* Add Hydration effect tag
This is equivalent to a "Placement" effect in that it's a new insertion
to the tree but it doesn't need an actual mutation.
It is only used to determine if a subtree has actually mounted yet.
* Use the Hydration flag for Roots
Previous roots had a Placement flag on them as a hack for this case but
since we have a special flag for it now, we can just use that.
* Add Flare test
The semantics of 'button' on events differs between PointerEvent and
MouseEvent, whereas they are the same for 'buttons'. Furthermore, 'buttons'
allows developers to determine when multiple buttons are pressed as the same
time.
https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#the-button-property
* Add a way to skip/only tests to RulesOfHooks test
* [ESLint] Forbid top-level use*() calls
* Add a regression test for logical expressions
This is not a change. Just adding more coverage.
This patch formalizes the mock native events and event sequences used in unit tests.
The `createEventTarget` function returns an object that can be used to dispatch native event sequences on the target without having to manually do so across all the scenarios we need to account for. Unit tests can be written as if we were only working with PointerEvent, but they will dispatch realistic native event sequences based on the execution environment (e.g., is PointerEvent supported?) and pointer type.
```
describe.each(environments)('Suite', (hasPointerEvents) => {
beforeEach(() => {
// setup
});
test.each(pointerTypes)('Test', (pointerType) => {
const target = createEventTarget(node);
target.pointerdown({pointerType});
expect(callback).toBeCalled();
});
});
```
Every native event that is dispatched now includes a complete object by default. The properties of the events can be customized. Properties that shouldn't be relied on in responder implementations are excluded from the mock native events to ensure tests will fail. Equivalent properties are normalized across different event types, e.g., 'pointerId' is converted to 'identifier' before a TouchEvent is dispatched.
Brian Vaughn