one single child in ternary
This commit is contained in:
parent
7db760427c
commit
119e29ff1d
|
@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ permalink: jsx-root-node-count-tip.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Currently, in a component's `render`, you can only return one node; if you have, say, a list of `div`s to return, you must wrap your components within a `div`, `span` or any other component.
|
Currently, in a component's `render`, you can only return one node; if you have, say, a list of `div`s to return, you must wrap your components within a `div`, `span` or any other component.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Don't forget that JSX compiles into regular js; returning two functions doesn't really make syntactic sense.
|
Don't forget that JSX compiles into regular js; returning two functions doesn't really make syntactic sense. Likewise, don't put more than one child in a ternary.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ You're getting a parsing error from JSX.
|
||||||
You might have tried to return more than one node in your component's `render`. Currently, you can only return one node, meaning that you must wrap your components within, say, a `div` or a `span` (or any other component).
|
You might have tried to return more than one node in your component's `render`. Currently, you can only return one node, meaning that you must wrap your components within, say, a `div` or a `span` (or any other component).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Discussion
|
### Discussion
|
||||||
Don't forget that JSX compiles into regular js; returning two functions doesn't really make syntactic sense.
|
Don't forget that JSX compiles into regular js; returning two functions doesn't really make syntactic sense. Likewise, don't put more than one child in a ternary.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue