transformers/examples/language-modeling
Jin Young (Daniel) Sohn 21d719238c
Add cache_dir to save features TextDataset (#6879)
* Add cache_dir to save features TextDataset

This is in case the dataset is in a RO filesystem, for which is the case
in tests (GKE TPU tests).

* style
2020-09-01 11:42:17 -04:00
..
README.md XLNet PLM Readme (#6121) 2020-07-29 11:38:15 -04:00
run_language_modeling.py Add cache_dir to save features TextDataset (#6879) 2020-09-01 11:42:17 -04:00

README.md

Language model training

Based on the script run_language_modeling.py.

Fine-tuning (or training from scratch) the library models for language modeling on a text dataset for GPT, GPT-2, BERT, DistilBERT and RoBERTa. GPT and GPT-2 are fine-tuned using a causal language modeling (CLM) loss while BERT, DistilBERT and RoBERTa are fine-tuned using a masked language modeling (MLM) loss.

Before running the following example, you should get a file that contains text on which the language model will be trained or fine-tuned. A good example of such text is the WikiText-2 dataset.

We will refer to two different files: $TRAIN_FILE, which contains text for training, and $TEST_FILE, which contains text that will be used for evaluation.

GPT-2/GPT and causal language modeling

The following example fine-tunes GPT-2 on WikiText-2. We're using the raw WikiText-2 (no tokens were replaced before the tokenization). The loss here is that of causal language modeling.

export TRAIN_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.train.raw
export TEST_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.test.raw

python run_language_modeling.py \
    --output_dir=output \
    --model_type=gpt2 \
    --model_name_or_path=gpt2 \
    --do_train \
    --train_data_file=$TRAIN_FILE \
    --do_eval \
    --eval_data_file=$TEST_FILE

This takes about half an hour to train on a single K80 GPU and about one minute for the evaluation to run. It reaches a score of ~20 perplexity once fine-tuned on the dataset.

RoBERTa/BERT/DistilBERT and masked language modeling

The following example fine-tunes RoBERTa on WikiText-2. Here too, we're using the raw WikiText-2. The loss is different as BERT/RoBERTa have a bidirectional mechanism; we're therefore using the same loss that was used during their pre-training: masked language modeling.

In accordance to the RoBERTa paper, we use dynamic masking rather than static masking. The model may, therefore, converge slightly slower (over-fitting takes more epochs).

We use the --mlm flag so that the script may change its loss function.

export TRAIN_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.train.raw
export TEST_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.test.raw

python run_language_modeling.py \
    --output_dir=output \
    --model_type=roberta \
    --model_name_or_path=roberta-base \
    --do_train \
    --train_data_file=$TRAIN_FILE \
    --do_eval \
    --eval_data_file=$TEST_FILE \
    --mlm

XLNet and permutation language modeling

XLNet uses a different training objective, which is permutation language modeling. It is an autoregressive method to learn bidirectional contexts by maximizing the expected likelihood over all permutations of the input sequence factorization order.

We use the --plm_probability flag to define the ratio of length of a span of masked tokens to surrounding context length for permutation language modeling.

The --max_span_length flag may also be used to limit the length of a span of masked tokens used for permutation language modeling.

export TRAIN_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.train.raw
export TEST_FILE=/path/to/dataset/wiki.test.raw

python run_language_modeling.py \
    --output_dir=output \
    --model_name_or_path=xlnet-base-cased \
    --do_train \
    --train_data_file=$TRAIN_FILE \
    --do_eval \
    --eval_data_file=$TEST_FILE \