Remove support for alias `-Z symbol-mangling-version`
(This is very similar to the removal of `-Z instrument-coverage` in #117111.)
`-C symbol-mangling-version` was stabilized back in rustc 1.59.0 (2022-02-24) via #90128, with the old unstable flag kept around (with a warning) as an alias to ease migration.
Clarify `Unsize` documentation
The documentation erroneously says that:
```rust
/// - Types implementing a trait `Trait` also implement `Unsize<dyn Trait>`.
/// - Structs `Foo<..., T, ...>` implement `Unsize<Foo<..., U, ...>>` if all of these conditions
/// are met:
/// - `T: Unsize<U>`.
/// - Only the last field of `Foo` has a type involving `T`.
/// - `Bar<T>: Unsize<Bar<U>>`, where `Bar<T>` stands for the actual type of that last field.
```
Specifically, `T: Unsize<U>` is not required to hold -- only the final field must implement `FinalField<T>: Unsize<FinalField<U>>`. This can be demonstrated by the test I added.
---
Second commit fleshes out the documentation a lot more.
Don't check for alias bounds in liveness when aliases have escaping bound vars
I actually have no idea how we *should* be treating aliases with escaping bound vars here... but the simplest behavior is just doing what we used to do before.
r? aliemjay
Fixes#117455
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming
If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.
Fix#72298.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Match usize/isize exhaustively with half-open ranges
The long-awaited finale to the saga of [exhaustiveness checking for integers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50912)!
```rust
match 0usize {
0.. => {} // exhaustive!
}
match 0usize {
0..usize::MAX => {} // helpful error message!
}
```
Features:
- Half-open ranges behave as expected for `usize`/`isize`;
- Trying to use `0..usize::MAX` will tell you that `usize::MAX..` is missing and explain why. No more unhelpful "`_` is missing";
- Everything else stays the same.
This should unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854.
Review-wise:
- I recommend looking commit-by-commit;
- This regresses perf because of the added complexity in `IntRange`; hopefully not too much;
- I measured each `#[inline]`, they all help a bit with the perf regression (tho I don't get why);
- I did not touch MIR building; I expect there's an easy PR there that would skip unnecessary comparisons when the range is half-open.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116267 (Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks)
- #116712 (When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers)
- #117416 (Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted)
- #117421 (coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions)
- #117438 (Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted
Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.
Happy to iterate on this.
Fixes#117413
r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
Store #[deprecated] attribute's `since` value in parsed form
This PR implements the first followup bullet listed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117148#issue-1960240108.
We centralize error handling to the attribute parsing code in `compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs`, and thereby remove some awkward error codepaths from later phases of compilation that had to make sense of these #\[deprecated\] attributes, namely `compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs` and `compiler/rustc_middle/src/middle/stability.rs`.
Detect object safety errors when assoc type is missing
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit
an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing
associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different
errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is
impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116862 (Detect when trait is implemented for type and suggest importing it)
- #117389 (Some diagnostics improvements of `gen` blocks)
- #117396 (Don't treat closures/coroutine types as part of the public API)
- #117398 (Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness)
- #117403 (Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it)
- #117411 (Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds)
- #117414 (Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit
Currently, we will normalize `Opaque := Option<&Opaque>` to something like `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>`, hitting a limit and bottoming out in an unnormalized opaque after the recursion limit gets hit.
Unfortunately, during `layout_of`, we'll simply recurse and try again if the type normalizes to something different than the type:
e6e931dda5/compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs (L58-L60)
That means then we'll try to normalize `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>` again, substituting `Opaque` into itself even deeper. Eventually this will get to the point that we're just stack-overflowing on a really deep type before even hitting an opaque again.
To fix this, we just bottom out into `ty::Error` instead of the unrevealed opaque type.
Fixes#117412
r? `@oli-obk`
Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds
* uses better spans
* clarifies a message that was only talking about generic params, but applies to `dyn ?Trait` and `impl ?Trait` as well
Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it
fixes#117379
Though if some code invokes typeck without having first invoked `check_well_formed` then we'll encounter this ICE again. This can happen in const and const fn bodies if they are evaluated due to other `check_well_formed` checks or similar
Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness
I had assumed nested or-patterns were flattened, and they mostly are but not always.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117378
Fix missing leading space in suggestion
For a local pattern with no space between `let` and `(` e.g.:
```rust
let(_a) = 3;
```
we were previously suggesting this illegal code:
```rust
let_a = 3;
```
After this change the suggestion will instead be:
```rust
let _a = 3;
```
Fixes#117380
C-variadic error improvements
A couple improvements for c-variadic errors:
1. Fix the bad-c-variadic error being emitted multiple times. If a function incorrectly contains multiple `...` args, and is also not foreign or `unsafe extern "C"`, only emit the latter error once rather than once per `...`.
2. Explicitly reject `const` C-variadic functions. Trying to use C-variadics in a const function would previously fail with an error like "destructor of `VaListImpl<'_>` cannot be evaluated at compile-time". Add an explicit check for const C-variadics to provide a clearer error: "functions cannot be both `const` and C-variadic". This also addresses one of the concerns in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930: "Ensure that even when this gets stabilized for regular functions, it is still rejected on const fn."
On object safety error, mention new enum as alternative
When we encounter a `dyn Trait` that isn't object safe, look for its implementors. If there's one, mention using it directly If there are less than 9, mention the possibility of creating a new enum and using that instead.
Fix#80194.
Trying to use C-variadics in a const function would previously fail with
an error like "destructor of `VaListImpl<'_>` cannot be evaluated at
compile-time".
Add an explicit check for const C-variadics to provide a clearer error:
"functions cannot be both `const` and C-variadic".
bors