Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Kimock 18b0a07d49 Handle a few more simple tests 2024-05-20 11:13:10 -04:00
Zalathar 14d56e8338 Fix test problems discovered by the revision check
Most of these changes either add revision names that were apparently missing,
or explicitly mark a revision name as currently unused.
2024-05-09 14:47:09 +10:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe) b4936133bb
Split dots in filename, not the entire path 2024-03-04 19:30:53 +00:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe) ec2cc761bc
[AUTO-GENERATED] Migrate ui tests from `//` to `//@` directives 2024-02-16 20:02:50 +00:00
Nilstrieb 41e8d152dc Show number in error message even for one error
Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
2023-11-24 19:15:52 +01:00
Joshua Nelson 71f04bdb5a Fix no_std tests that load libc when download-rustc is enabled
There were a series of unfortunate interactions here. Here's an MCVE of the test this fixes (committed as `tests/ui/meta/no_std-extern-libc.rs`):
```rust
 #![crate_type = "lib"]
 #![no_std]
 #![feature(rustc_private)]
extern crate libc;
```

Before, this would give an error about duplicate versions of libc:
```
error[E0464]: multiple candidates for `rlib` dependency `libc` found
  --> fake-test-src-base/allocator/no_std-alloc-error-handler-default.rs:15:1
   |
LL | extern crate libc;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: candidate #1: /home/gh-jyn514/rust/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-358db1024b7d9957.rlib
   = note: candidate #2: /home/gh-jyn514/rust/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-ebc478710122a279.rmeta
```
Both these versions were downloaded from CI, but one came from the `rust-std` component and one came from `rustc-dev`:
```
; tar -tf build/cache/f2d9a3d0771504f1ae776226a5799dcb4408a91a/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz | grep liblibc
rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-68a2d9e195dd6ed2.rlib
; tar -tf build/cache/f2d9a3d0771504f1ae776226a5799dcb4408a91a/rustc-dev-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz | grep liblibc
rustc-dev-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rustc-dev/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-f226c9fbdd92a0fd.rmeta
```
The fix was to only copy files from `rust-std` unless a Step explicitly requests for the `rustc-dev` components to be available by calling `builder.ensure(compile::Rustc)`.

To avoid having to re-parse the `rustc-dev.tar.xz` tarball every time, which is quite slow, this adds a new `build/host/ci-rustc/.rustc-dev-contents` cache file which stores only the names of files we need to copy into the sysroot.

This also allows reverting the hack in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110121; now that we only copy
rustc-dev on-demand, we can correctly add the `Rustc` check artifacts
into the sysroot, so that this works correctly even when
`download-rustc` is forced to `true`.

---

See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108767#issuecomment-1501217657 for why `no_std` is required for the MCVE test to fail; it's complicated and not particularly important.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108767.
2023-04-18 07:14:01 -05:00
Albert Larsan cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests 2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00