Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126792 (wasm64 build with target-feature=+simd128,+atomics)
- #127195 (Remove unqualified form import of io::Error in process_vxworks.rs and fallback on remove_dir_impl for vxworks)
- #127287 (jsondocck: Use correct index for error message.)
- #127289 (rustdoc-json: Better representation of lifetime bounds in where clauses.)
- #127303 (chore: remove repeat words)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
When dry run is enabled, the command for finding LLDB version would succeed, but return an empty string. This was inadvertently enabling a code path that should only be executed when the LLDB is actually present and its version is valid. This commit makes sure that if the version is empty, LLDB will be considered not found.
jsondocck: Use correct index for error message.
If you misused a count command like ``@count` $some.selector '"T'"`, you would panic with OOB:
```
thread 'main' panicked at src/tools/jsondocck/src/main.rs:76:92:
index out of bounds: the len is 2 but the index is 2
```
This is because 57c85bd97d removed the file param, but didn't update the error case. We now error with:
```
Invalid command: Second argument to `@count` must be a valid usize (got `"T"`) on line 20
```
As some point I want to rewrite this code to avoid indexing in general, but this is a nice small fix.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Remove unqualified form import of io::Error in process_vxworks.rs and fallback on remove_dir_impl for vxworks
Hi all,
This is to address issue #127084. On inspections it was found that io::Error refrences were all of qualified form and there was no need to add a unqualified form import. Also to successfully build rust for vxworks, we need to fallback on the remove_impl_dir implementations.
Thank you.
Optimize SipHash by reordering compress instructions
This PR optimizes hashing by changing the order of instructions in the sip.rs `compress` macro so the CPU can parallelize it better. The new order is taken directly from Fig 2.1 in [the SipHash paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/351.pdf) (but with the xors moved which makes it a little faster). I attempted to optimize it some more after this, but I think this might be the optimal instruction order. Note that this shouldn't change the behavior of hashing at all, only statements that don't depend on each other were reordered.
It appears like the current order hasn't changed since its [original implementation from 2012](fada46c421 (diff-b751133c229259d7099bbbc7835324e5504b91ab1aded9464f0c48cd22e5e420R35)) which doesn't look like it was written with data dependencies in mind.
Running `./x bench library/core --stage 0 --test-args hash` before and after this change shows the following results:
Before:
```
benchmarks:
hash::sip::bench_bytes_4 7.20/iter +/- 0.70
hash::sip::bench_bytes_7 9.01/iter +/- 0.35
hash::sip::bench_bytes_8 8.12/iter +/- 0.10
hash::sip::bench_bytes_a_16 10.07/iter +/- 0.44
hash::sip::bench_bytes_b_32 13.46/iter +/- 0.71
hash::sip::bench_bytes_c_128 37.75/iter +/- 0.48
hash::sip::bench_long_str 121.18/iter +/- 3.01
hash::sip::bench_str_of_8_bytes 11.20/iter +/- 0.25
hash::sip::bench_str_over_8_bytes 11.20/iter +/- 0.26
hash::sip::bench_str_under_8_bytes 9.89/iter +/- 0.59
hash::sip::bench_u32 9.57/iter +/- 0.44
hash::sip::bench_u32_keyed 6.97/iter +/- 0.10
hash::sip::bench_u64 8.63/iter +/- 0.07
```
After:
```
benchmarks:
hash::sip::bench_bytes_4 6.64/iter +/- 0.14
hash::sip::bench_bytes_7 8.19/iter +/- 0.07
hash::sip::bench_bytes_8 8.59/iter +/- 0.68
hash::sip::bench_bytes_a_16 9.73/iter +/- 0.49
hash::sip::bench_bytes_b_32 12.70/iter +/- 0.06
hash::sip::bench_bytes_c_128 32.38/iter +/- 0.20
hash::sip::bench_long_str 102.99/iter +/- 0.82
hash::sip::bench_str_of_8_bytes 10.71/iter +/- 0.21
hash::sip::bench_str_over_8_bytes 11.73/iter +/- 0.17
hash::sip::bench_str_under_8_bytes 10.33/iter +/- 0.41
hash::sip::bench_u32 10.41/iter +/- 0.29
hash::sip::bench_u32_keyed 9.50/iter +/- 0.30
hash::sip::bench_u64 8.44/iter +/- 1.09
```
I ran this on my computer so there's some noise, but you can tell at least `bench_long_str` is significantly faster (~18%).
Also, I noticed the same compress function from the library is used in the compiler as well, so I took the liberty of copy-pasting this change to there as well.
Thanks `@semisol` for porting SipHash for another project which led me to notice this issue in Rust, and for helping investigate. <3
rustdoc: update to pulldown-cmark 0.11
r? rustdoc
This pull request updates rustdoc to the latest version of pulldown-cmark. Along with adding new markdown extensions (which this PR doesn't enable), the new pulldown-cmark version also fixes a large number of bugs. Because all text files successfully parse as markdown, these bugfixes change the output, which can break people's existing docs.
A crater run, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121659, has already been run for this change.
The first commit upgrades and fixes rustdoc. The second commit adds a lint for the footnote and block quote parser changes, which break the largest numbers of docs in the Crater run. The strikethrough change was mitigated in pulldown-cmark itself.
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12876
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #127092 (Change return-type-notation to use `(..)`)
- #127184 (More refactorings to rustc_interface)
- #127190 (Update LLVM submodule)
- #127253 (Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error)
- #127280 (Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu)
- #127294 (Less magic number for corountine)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126917 we disabled `inaccessible-temp-dir` on `riscv64gc-gnu` because the container runs the build as `root` (just like the `armhf-gnu` builds). Tests creating an inaccessible test directory are not possible, since `root` can always touch those directories.
553a69030e/src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/disabled/riscv64gc-gnu/Dockerfile (L99)
This means the tests are run as `root`. As `root`, it's perfectly normal and reasonable to violate permission checks this way:
```bash
$ sudo mkdir scratch
$ sudo chmod o-w scratch
$ sudo mkdir scratch/backs
$
```
Because of this, this PR makes the test ignored on `riscv64gc` (just like on `armhf-gnu`) for now.
As an alternative, I believe the best long-term strategy would be to not run the tests as `root` for this job. Some preliminary exploration was done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126917#issuecomment-2189933970, however that appears a larger lift.
## Testing
> [!NOTE]
> `riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu` is a [**Tier 2 with Host Tools** platform](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/rustc/platform-support.html), all tests may not necessarily pass! This change should only ignore `inaccessible-temp-dir` and not affect other tests.
You can test out the job locally:
```sh
DEPLOY=1 ./src/ci/docker/run.sh riscv64gc-gnu
```
r? `@jieyouxu`
Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error
Fixes#126246
I tried to fix it in the `find_errors` of ArgMatrix, but seems it's hard to avoid breaking some other test cases.
The root cause is we eliminate the first argument even with a type error at here:
6292b2af62/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs (L664)
So the left argument is always treated as extra one.
But if there is already a type error, an error message will be generated firstly, which make this issue a trivial one.
If you misused a count command like `@count $some.selector '"T'"`, you would panic with OOB:
```
thread 'main' panicked at src/tools/jsondocck/src/main.rs:76:92:
index out of bounds: the len is 2 but the index is 2
```
Fixing this typo, we now get.
```
Invalid command: Second argument to @count must be a valid usize (got `"T"`) on line 20
```
As some point I want to rewrite this code to avoid indexing in general, but this is a nice small fix.
Johannes Hostert