Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Kimock a76cae0234 Bless coverage-map tests 2023-10-17 19:53:51 -04:00
Zalathar 86a66c8171 coverage: Store each BCB's code regions in one coverage statement
If a BCB has more than one code region, those extra regions can now all be
stored in the same coverage statement, instead of being stored in additional
statements.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00
Zalathar 59a11af1f9 coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero
There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings
for an unused function.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00
Zalathar 3de082497e coverage: Regression test for functions with unreachable bodies 2023-10-01 14:44:27 +11:00
Zalathar 527c629cd9 coverage: Explicitly simplify coverage expressions in codegen
After coverage instrumentation and MIR transformations, we can sometimes end up
with coverage expressions that always have a value of zero. Any expression
operand that refers to an always-zero expression can be replaced with a literal
`Operand::Zero`, making the emitted coverage mapping data smaller and simpler.

This simplification step is mostly redundant with the simplifications performed
inline in `expressions_with_regions`, except that it does a slightly more
thorough job in some cases (because it checks for always-zero expressions
*after* other simplifications).

However, adding this simplification step will then let us greatly simplify that
code, without affecting the quality of the emitted coverage maps.
2023-09-21 18:32:49 +10:00
Zalathar a4cb31bb58 coverage: Regression test for inconsistent handling of closure spans 2023-09-18 22:33:05 +10:00
Zalathar 4690f97099 coverage: Fix an unstable-sort inconsistency in coverage spans
This code was calling `sort_unstable_by`, but failed to impose a total order on
the initial spans. That resulted in unpredictable handling of closure spans,
producing inconsistencies in the coverage maps and in user-visible coverage
reports.

This patch fixes the problem by always sorting closure spans before
otherwise-identical non-closure spans, and also switches to a stable sort in
case the ordering is still not total.
2023-09-18 21:28:56 +10:00
Andy Caldwell 0ca6c38cc2
Fix up run-coverage and coverage-map/status-quo tests 2023-09-08 12:46:23 +01:00
Zalathar 3141177995 Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo`
The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but
we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by
codegen/LLVM.

If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or
MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as
the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-09-05 11:55:34 +10:00
Zalathar 004db4728b Add test suite `coverage-map` to test coverage mappings emitted by LLVM
We compile each test file to LLVM IR assembly, and then pass that IR to a
dedicated program that can decode LLVM coverage maps and print them in a more
human-readable format. We can then check that output against known-good
snapshots.

This test suite has some advantages over the existing `run-coverage` tests:

- We can test coverage instrumentation without needing to run target binaries.

- We can observe subtle improvements/regressions in the underlying coverage
mappings that don't make a visible difference to coverage reports.
2023-09-05 11:55:17 +10:00