Stabilize `min_exhaustive_patterns`

This commit is contained in:
Nadrieril 2024-03-20 19:24:42 +01:00
parent 19469cb536
commit cd40769c02
10 changed files with 19 additions and 39 deletions

View File

@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ declare_features! (
(accepted, min_const_generics, "1.51.0", Some(74878)),
/// Allows calling `const unsafe fn` inside `unsafe` blocks in `const fn` functions.
(accepted, min_const_unsafe_fn, "1.33.0", Some(55607)),
/// Allows exhaustive pattern matching on uninhabited types when matched by value.
(accepted, min_exhaustive_patterns, "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION", Some(119612)),
/// Allows using `Self` and associated types in struct expressions and patterns.
(accepted, more_struct_aliases, "1.16.0", Some(37544)),
/// Allows using the MOVBE target feature.

View File

@ -519,9 +519,6 @@ declare_features! (
(unstable, macro_metavar_expr_concat, "1.81.0", Some(124225)),
/// Allows `#[marker]` on certain traits allowing overlapping implementations.
(unstable, marker_trait_attr, "1.30.0", Some(29864)),
/// Allows exhaustive pattern matching on types that contain uninhabited types in cases that are
/// unambiguously sound.
(unstable, min_exhaustive_patterns, "1.77.0", Some(119612)),
/// A minimal, sound subset of specialization intended to be used by the
/// standard library until the soundness issues with specialization
/// are fixed.

View File

@ -208,14 +208,11 @@ impl<'pat, 'tcx> MatchPairTree<'pat, 'tcx> {
subpairs = cx.field_match_pairs(downcast_place, subpatterns);
let irrefutable = adt_def.variants().iter_enumerated().all(|(i, v)| {
i == variant_index || {
(cx.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
|| cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
&& !v
.inhabited_predicate(cx.tcx, adt_def)
.instantiate(cx.tcx, args)
.apply_ignore_module(cx.tcx, cx.param_env)
}
i == variant_index
|| !v
.inhabited_predicate(cx.tcx, adt_def)
.instantiate(cx.tcx, args)
.apply_ignore_module(cx.tcx, cx.param_env)
}) && (adt_def.did().is_local()
|| !adt_def.is_variant_list_non_exhaustive());
if irrefutable {

View File

@ -695,9 +695,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> MatchVisitor<'p, 'tcx> {
// Emit an extra note if the first uncovered witness would be uninhabited
// if we disregard visibility.
let witness_1_is_privately_uninhabited = if (self.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
|| self.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
&& let Some(witness_1) = witnesses.get(0)
let witness_1_is_privately_uninhabited = if let Some(witness_1) = witnesses.get(0)
&& let ty::Adt(adt, args) = witness_1.ty().kind()
&& adt.is_enum()
&& let Constructor::Variant(variant_index) = witness_1.ctor()
@ -1059,7 +1057,7 @@ fn report_non_exhaustive_match<'p, 'tcx>(
err.note("`&str` cannot be matched exhaustively, so a wildcard `_` is necessary");
} else if cx.is_foreign_non_exhaustive_enum(ty) {
err.note(format!("`{ty}` is marked as non-exhaustive, so a wildcard `_` is necessary to match exhaustively"));
} else if cx.is_uninhabited(ty.inner()) && cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns {
} else if cx.is_uninhabited(ty.inner()) {
// The type is uninhabited yet there is a witness: we must be in the `MaybeInvalid`
// case.
err.note(format!("`{ty}` is uninhabited but is not being matched by value, so a wildcard `_` is required"));

View File

@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ pub trait PatCx: Sized + fmt::Debug {
type PatData: Clone;
fn is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool;
fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool;
/// The number of fields for this constructor.
fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize;

View File

@ -237,9 +237,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> {
let tys = cx.variant_sub_tys(ty, variant).map(|(field, ty)| {
let is_visible =
adt.is_enum() || field.vis.is_accessible_from(cx.module, cx.tcx);
let is_uninhabited = (cx.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
|| cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
&& cx.is_uninhabited(*ty);
let is_uninhabited = cx.is_uninhabited(*ty);
let skip = is_uninhabited && (!is_visible || is_non_exhaustive);
(ty, PrivateUninhabitedField(skip))
});
@ -925,9 +923,6 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> PatCx for RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> {
fn is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
self.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
}
fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
self.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns
}
fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &crate::constructor::Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize {
self.ctor_arity(ctor, *ty)

View File

@ -543,13 +543,11 @@
//! recurse into subpatterns. That second part is done through [`PlaceValidity`], most notably
//! [`PlaceValidity::specialize`].
//!
//! Having said all that, in practice we don't fully follow what's been presented in this section.
//! Let's call "toplevel exception" the case where the match scrutinee itself has type `!` or
//! `EmptyEnum`. First, on stable rust, we require `_` patterns for empty types in all cases apart
//! from the toplevel exception. The `exhaustive_patterns` and `min_exaustive_patterns` allow
//! omitting patterns in the cases described above. There's a final detail: in the toplevel
//! exception or with the `exhaustive_patterns` feature, we ignore place validity when checking
//! whether a pattern is required for exhaustiveness. I (Nadrieril) hope to deprecate this behavior.
//! Having said all that, we don't fully follow what's been presented in this section. For
//! backwards-compatibility, we ignore place validity when checking whether a pattern is required
//! for exhaustiveness in two cases: when the `exhaustive_patterns` feature gate is on, or when the
//! match scrutinee itself has type `!` or `EmptyEnum`. I (Nadrieril) hope to deprecate this
//! exception.
//!
//!
//!
@ -953,13 +951,10 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> PlaceInfo<Cx> {
self.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors);
// Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if
// it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`).
let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid()
&& (is_toplevel_exception
|| cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()
|| cx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on());
let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid();
// Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the
// toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility.
let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable
let can_omit_empty_arms = self.validity.is_known_valid()
|| is_toplevel_exception
|| cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on();

View File

@ -152,10 +152,6 @@ impl PatCx for Cx {
false
}
fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
true
}
fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize {
ty.sub_tys(ctor).len()
}

View File

@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> Iterator for IntoIter<T, A> {
{
match self.try_fold(init, |b, item| Ok::<B, !>(f(b, item))) {
Ok(b) => b,
#[cfg(bootstrap)]
Err(e) => match e {},
}
}
@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> DoubleEndedIterator for IntoIter<T, A> {
{
match self.try_rfold(init, |b, item| Ok::<B, !>(f(b, item))) {
Ok(b) => b,
#[cfg(bootstrap)]
Err(e) => match e {},
}
}

View File

@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
//@ revisions: normal min_exh_pats exhaustive_patterns never_pats
// gate-test-min_exhaustive_patterns
//
// This tests correct handling of empty types in exhaustiveness checking.
//