more eagerly discard constraints on overflow

This commit is contained in:
lcnr 2024-09-12 14:32:44 +02:00
parent 7c7372b6a1
commit 675c99f4d5
5 changed files with 27 additions and 35 deletions

View File

@ -122,6 +122,21 @@ where
(certainty, NestedNormalizationGoals::empty())
};
if let Certainty::Maybe(cause @ MaybeCause::Overflow { .. }) = certainty {
// If we have overflow, it's probable that we're substituting a type
// into itself infinitely and any partial substitutions in the query
// response are probably not useful anyways, so just return an empty
// query response.
//
// This may prevent us from potentially useful inference, e.g.
// 2 candidates, one ambiguous and one overflow, which both
// have the same inference constraints.
//
// Changing this to retain some constraints in the future
// won't be a breaking change, so this is good enough for now.
return Ok(self.make_ambiguous_response_no_constraints(cause));
}
let external_constraints =
self.compute_external_query_constraints(certainty, normalization_nested_goals);
let (var_values, mut external_constraints) = (self.var_values, external_constraints)

View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ use crate::delegate::SolverDelegate;
use crate::solve::inspect::{self, ProofTreeBuilder};
use crate::solve::search_graph::SearchGraph;
use crate::solve::{
CanonicalInput, CanonicalResponse, Certainty, Goal, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource, MaybeCause,
CanonicalInput, CanonicalResponse, Certainty, Goal, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource,
NestedNormalizationGoals, NoSolution, PredefinedOpaquesData, QueryResult, SolverMode,
FIXPOINT_STEP_LIMIT,
};
@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ where
canonical_goal,
&mut goal_evaluation,
);
let canonical_response = match canonical_response {
let response = match canonical_response {
Err(e) => {
self.inspect.goal_evaluation(goal_evaluation);
return Err(e);
@ -378,12 +378,11 @@ where
Ok(response) => response,
};
let (normalization_nested_goals, certainty, has_changed) = self
.instantiate_response_discarding_overflow(
goal.param_env,
orig_values,
canonical_response,
);
let has_changed = !response.value.var_values.is_identity_modulo_regions()
|| !response.value.external_constraints.opaque_types.is_empty();
let (normalization_nested_goals, certainty) =
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(goal.param_env, orig_values, response);
self.inspect.goal_evaluation(goal_evaluation);
// FIXME: We previously had an assert here that checked that recomputing
// a goal after applying its constraints did not change its response.
@ -398,24 +397,6 @@ where
Ok((normalization_nested_goals, has_changed, certainty))
}
fn instantiate_response_discarding_overflow(
&mut self,
param_env: I::ParamEnv,
original_values: Vec<I::GenericArg>,
response: CanonicalResponse<I>,
) -> (NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, Certainty, bool) {
if let Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow { .. }) = response.value.certainty {
return (NestedNormalizationGoals::empty(), response.value.certainty, false);
}
let has_changed = !response.value.var_values.is_identity_modulo_regions()
|| !response.value.external_constraints.opaque_types.is_empty();
let (normalization_nested_goals, certainty) =
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(param_env, original_values, response);
(normalization_nested_goals, certainty, has_changed)
}
fn compute_goal(&mut self, goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>) -> QueryResult<I> {
let Goal { param_env, predicate } = goal;
let kind = predicate.kind();

View File

@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ fn fulfillment_error_for_stalled<'tcx>(
Ok((_, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow { suggest_increasing_limit }))) => (
FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(suggest_increasing_limit) },
// Don't look into overflows because we treat overflows weirdly anyways.
// In `instantiate_response_discarding_overflow` we set `has_changed = false`,
// We discard the inference constraints from overflowing goals, so
// recomputing the goal again during `find_best_leaf_obligation` may apply
// inference guidance that makes other goals go from ambig -> pass, for example.
//

View File

@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ impl<I: Interner, P> Goal<I, P> {
/// Why a specific goal has to be proven.
///
/// This is necessary as we treat nested goals different depending on
/// their source.
/// their source. This is currently mostly used by proof tree visitors
/// but will be used by cycle handling in the future.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "nightly", derive(HashStable_NoContext))]
pub enum GoalSource {
@ -126,13 +127,6 @@ pub enum GoalSource {
///
/// FIXME(-Znext-solver=coinductive): Explain how and why this
/// changes whether cycles are coinductive.
///
/// This also impacts whether we erase constraints on overflow.
/// Erasing constraints is generally very useful for perf and also
/// results in better error messages by avoiding spurious errors.
/// We do not erase overflow constraints in `normalizes-to` goals unless
/// they are from an impl where-clause. This is necessary due to
/// backwards compatibility, cc trait-system-refactor-initiatitive#70.
ImplWhereBound,
/// Instantiating a higher-ranked goal and re-proving it.
InstantiateHigherRanked,

View File

@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ LL | impl<T> Overlap<T> for T {}
LL |
LL | impl<T> Overlap<for<'a> fn(Assoc<'a, T>)> for T where Missing: Overlap<T> {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `fn(_)`
|
= note: this behavior recently changed as a result of a bug fix; see rust-lang/rust#56105 for details
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors; 1 warning emitted