65b7603192
* fix(ci): address clippy issue * fix(ci): add missing nightly specifications * fix(ci): set all nightly references * chore(ci): do not lint example crates |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
assets | ||
src | ||
style | ||
.gitignore | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
LICENSE | ||
Makefile.toml | ||
README.md | ||
rust-toolchain.toml |
README.md
SSR Mode Axum Example
This example shows the different "rendering modes" that can be used while server-side rendering an application.
Getting Started
See the Examples README for setup and run instructions.
Server-Side Rendering Modes
-
Synchronous: Serve an HTML shell that includes
fallback
for anySuspense
. Load data on the client, replacingfallback
once they're loaded.- Pros: App shell appears very quickly: great TTFB (time to first byte).
- Cons: Resources load relatively slowly; you need to wait for JS + Wasm to load before even making a request.
-
Out-of-order streaming: Serve an HTML shell that includes
fallback
for anySuspense
. Load data on the server, streaming it down to the client as it resolves, and streaming down HTML forSuspense
nodes.- Pros: Combines the best of synchronous and
async
, with a very fast shell and resources that begin loading on the server. - Cons: Requires JS for suspended fragments to appear in correct order. Weaker meta tag support when it depends on data that's under suspense (has already streamed down
<head>
)
- Pros: Combines the best of synchronous and
-
In-order streaming: Walk through the tree, returning HTML synchronously as in synchronous rendering and out-of-order streaming until you hit a
Suspense
. At that point, wait for all its data to load, then render it, then the rest of the tree.- Pros: Does not require JS for HTML to appear in correct order.
- Cons: Loads the shell more slowly than out-of-order streaming or synchronous rendering because it needs to pause at every
Suspense
. Cannot begin hydration until the entire page has loaded, so earlier pieces of the page will not be interactive until the suspended chunks have loaded.
-
async
: Load all resources on the server. Wait until all data are loaded, and render HTML in one sweep.- Pros: Better handling for meta tags (because you know async data even before you render the
<head>
). Faster complete load than synchronous because async resources begin loading on server. - Cons: Slower load time/TTFB: you need to wait for all async resources to load before displaying anything on the client.
- Pros: Better handling for meta tags (because you know async data even before you render the
Quick Start
Run cargo leptos watch
to run this example.