gimp/README.win32

41 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext

For more information about the port or GLib, GTk+ and the GIMP to
native Windows, and pre-built binary packages, see
http://www.iki.fi/tml/gimp/win32/ or
http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/
To build the GIMP on Win32, you can use either Microsoft Visual C++ or
gcc. The gcc to use should be for a mingw configuration (producing
executables that don't depend on the cygwin dll). For more information
about the preparation necessary for building with gcc, what version
you want and where to get it, etc, read README.win32 in GLib 1.3 (or
later). (GLib 1.3 is the developer version and thus isn't distributed
per se, but available from CVS, and especially for Windows in zipfiles
from the web pages mentioned above.)
The GIMP wants to be built with the GNU "intl" library for
internationalisation (i18n). Get the version ported to Win32 from the
web site mentioned above. We build the "intl" library to a DLL called
gnu-intl.dll to reduce name clash risks. If you don't want any i18n
stuff, undefine ENABLE_NLS in the config.h.win32 file, and remove
references to the gnu-intl library from the makefiles.
Note that while the GNU gettext package is under the GPL (GNU General
Public License), the "intl" library part as distributed with GNU libc
is under the LGPL (GNU Lesser General Public License, a.k.a. GNU
Library General Public License). We want the LGPL-licensed version of
the intl library, even if they are the same, more or less. It doesn't
matter for the GIMP which itself is licensed under the GPL, but it
does matter for GTk+, which is licensed under the LGPL.
First, build in the libgimp directory, then in app, plug-ins, and
finally in modules. Check the makefile.msc or makefile.cygwin files in
said directories.
The current build setup for Windows is a mess, with complex
hand-maintained makefiles. I know. Adding parallel makefiles for gcc
didn't make it any cleaner. On the other hand, I don't think using the
Unix style configuration mechanism to generate mingw EXEs and DLLs is
quite feasible, either. I would love to be proved wrong.
--Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>