It is apparently how dependency names are supposed to be spelled to be taken
into account. The previous commits fixed some, but missed 2. I'm not sure they
will actually end up in the right-side list of the docs (it looks like when a
dependency is not actually found in the API, it isn't listed there), though it's
at least always listed in the left side, as I can see it.
And while I would prefer the upstream "display" name (i.e. GEGL and babl instead
of Gegl and Babl), better be consistent in how we list these dependencies in the
libgimp and libgimpui docs.
See discussion in !811.
Fixes:
> libgimp/gimpresourceselectbutton.c:510:9: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
> 510 | GimpResource *specific_value;
As well as some coding style bug (space after '*').
This fixes the VAPI build. I am actually astonished the lib build seem to have
passed and that we didn't get double definition clashes.
The build error was:
[750/2424] Generating libgimp/gimp-ui-3.0.vapi with a custom command
FAILED: libgimp/gimp-ui-3.0.vapi
/usr/bin/vapigen --quiet --library=gimp-ui-3.0 --directory=/builds/GNOME/gimp/_build/libgimp --pkg=babl-0.1 --pkg=cairo-1.0 --pkg=gdk-pixbuf-2.0 --pkg=gegl-0.4 --pkg=gio-2.0 --pkg=glib-2.0 --pkg=gobject-2.0 --pkg=gtk+-3.0 --vapidir=/builds/GNOME/gimp/_build/libgimp --girdir=/builds/GNOME/gimp/_build/libgimp --pkg=gimp-3.0 --metadatadir=/builds/GNOME/gimp/libgimp /builds/GNOME/gimp/_build/libgimp/GimpUi-3.0.gir
GimpUi-3.0.gir:22111.7-22111.33: warning: Virtual method `GimpUi.ResourceSelectButton.draw_interior' conflicts with method of the same name
GimpUi-3.0.gir:26688.73-26688.73: error: The type name `ResourceSelectButtonClass' could not be found
GimpUi-3.0.gir:26695.73-26695.73: error: The type name `ResourceSelectButtonClass' could not be found
GimpUi-3.0.gir:26704.73-26704.73: error: The type name `ResourceSelectButtonClass' could not be found
GimpUi-3.0.gir:26712.73-26712.73: error: The type name `ResourceSelectButtonClass' could not be found
GimpUi-3.0.gir:26720.73-26720.73: error: The type name `ResourceSelectButtonClass' could not be found
Simplifies chooser widgets (e.g. GimpBrushSelect) by eliminating attributes (e.g. opacity) of chosen resource.
See #8745, but this commit fixes that by first refactoring the code.
Refactors GUI widgets (e.g. GimpBrushSelectButton and GimpBrushSelect etc.)
Refactor by "Extract class" GimpResourceSelectButton from GimpBrushSelectButton etc.
This moves common code into an inherited class (formerly called GimpSelectButton)
but the subclasses still exist.
The subclasses mainly just do drawing now.
Refactor by "Extract module" GimpResourceSelect from GimpBrushSelect etc.
Moves common code into one file, generic at runtime on type of GimpResource,
that is, the new code dispatches on type i.e. switch statements.
In the future, when core is changed some of that can be deleted.
The files gimpbrushselect.[c,h] etc. are deleted.
The module adapts the API from core to the API of callbacks to libgimp.
Note that core is running the resource chooser (select) widgets remotely.
Core is still calling back over the wire via PDB with more attributes
than necessary.
The new design gets the attributes from the resource themselves,
instead of receiving them from core callback.
The libgimp side adapts by discarding unneeded attributes.
In the future, core (running choosers for plugins) can be simplified also.
Fix gimp_prop_chooser_brush_new same as other resources.
Finish changes, and clean style.
Annotations
So procedures can declare args and GimpProcedureDialog show chooser
widgets
Fix so is no error dialog on id_is_valid for resources
Palette.pdb changes and testing
Memory mgt changes
Gradient pdb
Font and Pattern tests
Test brush, palette
Cleanup, remove generator
Rebase, edit docs, install test-dialog.py
Whitespace, and fix failed distcheck
Fix some clang-format, fix fail distcheck
Fix distcheck
Cleanup from review Jehan
It is better to add a comment rather than simply disabling these 2 calls without
explanation on macOS. This way, developers who'll look at this code in the
future will immediately know what's the reason and status for the "unicity"
concept of GIMP process on macOS. Basically there are 3 features:
- Opening files from another software (such as "open with" in file browsers)
which is handled differently in macOS and apparently works fine. It looks like
it works by handling system signals, connected from gui_unique_quartz_init().
- Opening files by running a new GIMP process which would pipe the filenames
into an existing GIMP process before immediately exiting.
- Running batch process in an existing GIMP process, also by running a short-run
GIMP process.
The last 2 features are simply now officially disabled in macOS because dbus is
not installed by default and seem like it may cause issues when it is.
See discussions in !808 and #8997.
DBus can cause instability on the MacOS platform, and regardless
MacOS handles application uniqueness already.
The batch version has also been modified as it only applies if
compiled as an application, since it returns FALSE if it is complied
as a console app.
These are not used anymore anywhere in our codebase! I'm sure some issues still
exist in various places, yet we can now consider that the multi-item awareness
project is finally over! Wouhou! 🥳
One big question which remains is whether I want to get back to the old naming
of "active" items, rather than "selected" items. The main reason to change the
wording globally was to be able to easily find remnants of non-multi-item aware
code. Now that it's all gone, I could very simply revert to the old naming.
This is in particular a big question for the public API for plug-ins, as the
"active" wording has been used for decades litterally. The only difference now
with how it used to be is that we could have several active items at once.
- Duplicate and Delete Paths are now both callable on several paths at once.
- Path Edit and Edit Attributes can only be run with exactly one path selected.
- Merge Visible Paths obviously always worked with more than one path.
- "Discard Text Information" work on all selected text layers.
- "Text to Path" creates as many paths as there are selected text layers.
- "Text along Path" still only works with exactly 1 text layer and 1 path
selected.
This is because gimp_drawable_edit_clear() would also clear the full drawable in
the special case when there is no selection at all. So as we were inverting the
"all" selection, we were ending up in this special-case.
RGB 0..255/0..100 and LCh/HSV settings are now remembered when closing
and reopening GIMP.
A few enums were explicitly cast to GimpColorSelectorChannel to clear
some compiler warnings.
This second GIMP_IS_ITEM() test was obviously for the iter2->data item. This
fixes handling cases when aligning/distributing a mix of GimpItem-s and guides.
I'm not sure if there are a lot of cases where we might want to use the layer
extents for items to align while using the contents extents for the reference
(or the other way around). It looks to me you either want one of the other for
all the items in the most common case.
So for now, let's apply this option to both the items to align and the reference
item. We'll see if anyone wants a separate option some day and has a good use
case to submit for this.
Jehan